Kudu Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Eagle92 writes: "I'll be honest, I do like the fact that the members of the troop elect the SPL. It reminds me more of our democratic republic format," Yes, who among us would NOT take Green Bar Bill's power away from the Patrol Leaders, in exchange for the darling cuteness of a school election? Eagle92 writes: "The original SPL selection of GBB's, i.e. PLs elect the SPL, reminds me more of a parliamentary system. But again that's just me." No it's not just you, Eagle92. Thanks to the invention of "leadership" development, the BSA's "Real" Patrol Method has become so "foreign" to most Americans, that a committee of Patrol Leaders with the power to select their own coordinator strikes most of us "trained" adults as the "parliamentary system." Eagle92 writes: " i.e. the PLC= Congress and the SPL=President. It's just that the SPL also presides over the PLC. " Cut the crap Eagle92 Let's run our Troop Elections the RIGHT Way, with a Two Party System: Patrol Method Party = Parliament (Bad) Scouting conservatives ("Traditional," "Old-Fashioned," Patrol Adventure) Troop Method Party = America! (Good) Scouting liberals ("Modern," "Innovation," Webelos III "Controlled Failure" Bailouts) Scoutmaster = President (Power of the Veto). Appointed by the Electoral College (Scoutmaster can win popular vote & still lose election). PLC = Senate (Each Patrol equally represented) SPL = Vice President (Presides over the PLC. Appointed at his SM's party convention, after a series of Primary Elections in which the Scoutmaster candidates in both parties launch hateful smear campaigns against the other adults in their own party). Troop Committee = House of Representatives (Each Patrol votes for its favorite mommies and daddies) THIS IS VERY AMERICAN, because Baden-Powell's Patrol Leaders (Bad) run the Troop without any "Committee" of mommies and daddies! Eagle92 writes: "IMHO, it reinforces the concept that you must elect good leaders." I agree! In Realistic Troop Elections, if the Scouts elect adults that don't do exactly what they want, they can vote for new adults in six months Yours at 300 feet, Kudu http://kudu.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basementdweller Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Kudu So, before a fellow gets thrown into the breeches as it were..... Recommend some reading please. I see so many books listed what is the SM's must reads?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tampa Turtle Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Vote for the TMP! An Eagle by 14 is too late! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kudu Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 Basementdweller, "Must read" to implement Green Bar Bill's "Real" Patrol Method? The third edition of Handbook for Scoutmasters, Volume 1 and Volume 2: http://preview.tinyurl.com/83xh448 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oak Tree Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Well, that would be a real test for those who believe in "boy-led". Would you let the youth elect the SM? I think I'd like that option - at least it would give me the opportunity to consider stepping down every six months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beavah Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Yah, I have always recommended consultin' with the youth leaders on the selection of ASMs and SMs. Their perspective is an important one, both from a program quality perspective and a youth protection perspective. A good rule of thumb in a healthy program is that if the youth are opposed or are lukewarm to a candidate, the committee had best look elsewhere. Even in a program that's in need of a bit of gettin' kicked into shape, the youth perspective is still quite valuable and almost always on-the-money. Let's face it, da average parent or committee person doesn't really see a scouter in action anywhere near as much as the youth leaders. Beavah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basementdweller Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 Beavah.... funny you should mention that......When the SM said he was going to retire in 6 months and the COR asked me if I was interested in being SM that is exactly what I did... we were sitting around the campfire and the SM just broke it to the boys that he was stepping down in a couple of months......I followed up with asking if they had any thoughts about me becoming SM... They said yes, I asked the patrol leaders later if they had any thoughts....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle92 Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 Kudu, Gotta remember I use the Patrol Method as part of the Citizenship in the Community and Nation MBs. I've been very fortunate growing up. With the exception of one trip, the adults were old school and let the youth run things. And that one trip was a family trip and the momma's ruined it b/c they didn't want the Cubs with us upset b/c they couldn't do the hike inthe cold rain like the Boy Scouts. But that's a different story for a different thread We've had bad elections in my troop. One SPL got elected, showed up for a meeting or two, and then never appeared again. really emphasised that you need to know who you are voting for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now