Twocubdad Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 So out of 10 or so different posters here, at least three -- BD, airbornevet and camiam -- report being pressured to make mandatory contributions or face workplace reprisals. Hardly scientific but 30%? Wow. Why doesn't UW take action on this, or are they just happy to cash the checks? Why aren't payroll deductions kept confidential? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eaglescout1996 Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 They don't mind cashing the checks...I just checked the website of the UW I previously volunteered with. 19 employees...that's a lot of payroll and benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tampa Turtle Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 I do not like UW and I was a coordinator. However the original concept was that having one combined drive was less disruptive than a lot of little ones in the workplace and more efficient administratively. It was started by churches. I used to run a non-profit and raising money is expensive--I wouldn't say UW is a rip off. Yes they had the abusive 1982(?) William Aramony scandal and donations dropped. Some folks still hold them against them--but do we hold that same standard for BSA for abuse? At my workplace you had to turn in a card --mine was for $0-- but did participate in putting in some sweat equity in other fund raising events. The local chapter wanted 100% feedback -even if it was "no". You could direct your amount. There was no retribution at my workplace but I know of department where there was a lot of arm-twisting. That is the part I did not like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeptic Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 When we ran the annual drives, everyone was "encouraged" to donate, but not necessarily pledge. Got a lot of $1 donations. I know at least once or twice, in the last store in which I worked, the store manager expected his underling managers to kick in a donation for any of their employees that did not do so themselves. I ran the drive once, and it we had a dozen or so that refused to participate, for whatever reason. Yet, somehow, we ended up with 100%, due to the behind the scene directive. The real irony was that when less pressure was used, we had better results, even if fewer donated. I made sure that year that everyone "understood" directed donations, and that is how I was able to get quite a few holdouts to contribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tampa Turtle Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Yes I was low pressure --it was the depth of the recession--and we had our best year. I asked that everyone please try to do something and most everyone did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now