InquisitiveScouter Posted yesterday at 02:41 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 02:41 PM OK, the numbers are in.... Look at the numbers hidden by the "grace" period.... As of end of March 2025 (3 days ago) our council, compared to Dec 2024: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 6% Scouts Growth Rate, gain slightly more 7% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 10% Exploring Growth Rate, gain of almost 28% Overall, Total Growth Rate gain of slightly less than 1% Now, three days later, with the grace period expired, looking at comparison to Dec 2024 numbers: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of almost 25% Scouts Growth Rate, loss of almost 15% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of almost 49% Exploring Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 11% Overall, Total Growth Rate loss of almost 20% (Exact numbers and percentages not posted, to protect the innocent 😜 ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrjohns2 Posted yesterday at 05:50 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:50 PM 3 hours ago, InquisitiveScouter said: Look at the numbers hidden by the "grace" period.... As of end of March 2025 (3 days ago) our council, compared to Dec 2024: How about vs 4/1 of 2024? That would be a more apples to apples, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tron Posted yesterday at 06:46 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:46 PM 4 hours ago, InquisitiveScouter said: OK, the numbers are in.... Look at the numbers hidden by the "grace" period.... As of end of March 2025 (3 days ago) our council, compared to Dec 2024: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 6% Scouts Growth Rate, gain slightly more 7% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 10% Exploring Growth Rate, gain of almost 28% Overall, Total Growth Rate gain of slightly less than 1% Now, three days later, with the grace period expired, looking at comparison to Dec 2024 numbers: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of almost 25% Scouts Growth Rate, loss of almost 15% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of almost 49% Exploring Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 11% Overall, Total Growth Rate loss of almost 20% (Exact numbers and percentages not posted, to protect the innocent 😜 ) His numbers seem to jive with what I am seeing in my district/council. Sounds like we lost 25% of membership in 24 hours. On a personal note I got off the phone with my COR and I told them that we're fine, we have no action to take, the numbers that dropped from our roll were expected and unavoidable. I reminded them that the extra paperwork I had them chasing the past few weeks to get our handful of not renewed over the line is right now paying with dividends as no one at council can complain about our units membership status; we had no sloppy losses due to laziness (which I suspect a lot of other units are now dealing with). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InquisitiveScouter Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, mrjohns2 said: How about vs 4/1 of 2024? That would be a more apples to apples, no? I wasn't making that comparison, but was showing the effects of hiding numbers with a "grace" period. But, since you asked... From Apr 24 to Apr 25: Cub Scout: 2.4% loss, with a loss of 8 Packs Scout: 5.7% loss, with a loss of 8 Troops Venturing: 49% loss, with a loss of 1 Crew (it was a big and popular Crew) Exploring: 11% loss, with a loss of 3 Posts 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InquisitiveScouter Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago (edited) And I'll bet you the BSA Annual Report had numbers as of year end, which would include those under the grace period... that is, people who did not pay their renewal fees under the new system, but were being carried on the rolls anyway. So, whenever we do get to see the 2024 Annual Report, you could probably cut those numbers by 20-25% to get closer to reality. Edited 23 hours ago by InquisitiveScouter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrjohns2 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 53 minutes ago, InquisitiveScouter said: I wasn't making that comparison, but was showing the effects of hiding numbers with a "grace" period. But, since you asked... Thanks for the low point to low point comparison. This seems to be the real change, a loss of ~4-5% overall. Your other point is valid, though, like you said a different analysis. Your point brings about some misleading headlines that National seems to want to publicize by using low point to high point comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now