DuctTape Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, InquisitiveScouter said: One of the primary reasons the organization is failing, IMO. Yep. National should be funding the Councils. The "franchise model" does not work except for National. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACAN Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 My guess that if National funded councils 100% there would be a lot of DOGEing happening to reduce the number of councils. 😉 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle1993 Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 3 hours ago, PACAN said: My guess that if National funded councils 100% there would be a lot of DOGEing happening to reduce the number of councils. 😉 I expect that will happen. During the bankruptcy, there was a cross examination of a National leadership meeting that occurred, including a review of the slide deck. The leadership meeting was a small group (sounds like less than 10 people) who admitted that BSA is in crisis and drastic actions would have to be taken. One part of that was about a significant reduction in councils and their target was 80 total councils. This was several years ago. I expect the financial picture is clear now and the results of the recent fundraising push will be in soon. We know National believes we have too many councils given the number of scouts we have, so I won't be surprised if they start "DOGEing" to reduce the number of councils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now