Jump to content

YP and other stuff spun from Ch 11


ThenNow

Recommended Posts

  On 3/10/2021 at 8:16 PM, CynicalScouter said:

That you dismiss this as "psycho-babble" is sick.

Expand  

As I said before, previously, back when and also about other topics [insert greatly pained look], again I say, "What he said." Thanks for sparing me the need to comment on any of this. Seriously. "Good grief, Charlie Brown!" Oops. I did it again, one more time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 7:36 PM, MYCVAStory said:

Speak with victims and you will find that the established grooming behaviors are real.  In fact, victims realizing that the way they were unknowingly "groomed" was not unique to them and not their fault can be a very important step in dealing with the trauma they have suffered.

Expand  

When I referred to the eery feeling that the sexual predators in Scouting must've had a manual, this is what I meant. It may be metaphoric, but I wouldn't be surprised if they conspired and shared stories. The pattern of behavior, techniques, methodology, timing, language and "tools of the trade" are frighteningly familiar. I've read many, many retellings by former Scouts who were abused and it's chilling. I'm 100% serious. Believe me or don't. It matters not to me. This, my friends, is "grooming." Call it grooming, call it setting the trap, call it emotional and situational manipulation, call it luring, wooing, courting...whatever. The word has been universally accepted as describing this behavior by sexual predators. Oh. Drat. I stand corrected. Carve out a few teeny tiny itsy bitsy satellite exceptions within the vast expanse. 

Edited by ThenNow
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 7:26 PM, David CO said:

Psycho-babble.

Expand  

So I don't completely write this off, define your terms, please. If all psychological terminology - depression, PTSD, attachment disorder, mania/bi-polar disorder - amount to your term, I have a bucket into which I will place all of these comments. Maybe two buckets; one inside the other to keep it well contained.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:19 PM, swilliams said:

It's also very troubling that someone who is involved in scouting refuses to acknowledge the way in which many abusers form the kind of relationships that allow them to get close enough to begin the abuse.  A child is made to feel like they encouraged the behavior, leading to the belief it's their fault, and that no one can or will help them.

Expand  

Precisely my reason for saying I think it would be good for all adults to know, especially those who work with youth. It's critical to being both proactive and defensive/protective of those in one's charge from potential abuse.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 6:24 AM, David CO said:

Yes we are.  I firmly believe that without the lawsuits, or at least the threat of lawsuits, the executives would not have taken any action to end the child sexual abuse in BSA.  They only care about money.  

All current scouts benefit from these lawsuits.  The lawsuits make them safer.  Future generations of scouts will be safer because of these lawsuits.

 

Expand  

Safer?   Yeah I guess so.  Since it looks like the majority of camps will cease to exist,  troops will fold left and right,so the ex-scouts can safely stay in their basement playing WoW.  

Honest question, do you really think there will be 'future generations of scouts'?

  • Sad 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:19 PM, swilliams said:

It's also very troubling that someone who is involved in scouting refuses to acknowledge the way in which many abusers form the kind of relationships that allow them to get close enough to begin the abuse.

Expand  

Grooming isn't "psycho-babble" but the fact that people like @David COthink it is may help explain (a little) why child sexual abuse it still happening.

It comes from the mindset that child sexual abuse only happens with bad people kidnapping kids in vans with puppies and/or use of force.

That type abuse-by-force is the exception.

Edited by CynicalScouter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 8:48 PM, ThenNow said:

Um, you're a teacher. 

Expand  

Yep.  I'm a Health teacher.  Have been for 40 years now.  Sometimes I teach Science.

Along with a very good speaker from the local women's shelter,  I teach the "Erin's Law" class on sexual abuse prevention.  We have some lively discussions, and the kids are remarkably frank.  

One thing I am sure of.  There is no universally agreed upon view on any of these issues, especially from the kids.  Their opinions are all over the place.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:37 PM, Oldscout448 said:

do you really think there will be 'future generations of scouts'?

Expand  

I also wonder if it depends on the resources and current strength of those LC's (few?) that can fairly easily give some millions and still pivot on the strength of community support, leadership and donor base depth and breadth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:43 PM, David CO said:

One thing I am sure of.  There is no universally agreed upon view on any of these issues, especially from the kids.  Their opinions are all over the place.

Expand  

That solves everything. The children are providing the frame of reference and setting the terms of discussion. Roger that. 

"NO universally agree upon view" and "any of these issues." Is that your final answer? Moving on to the next contestant. I need the DavidCO dictionary to keep up.

Edited by ThenNow
Almost said, "the children are running the asylum..."
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:43 PM, David CO said:

There is no universally agreed upon view on any of these issues, especially from the kids.  Their opinions are all over the place.

Expand  

Here's "universally" agreed upon, except perhaps by you.

1) Grooming isn't "psycho-babble". It is real and it happens.

2) Dismissing "grooming" as "psycho-babble" is a sure fire way to ensure child sexual abuse continues.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 9:47 PM, ThenNow said:

That solves everything. The children are providing the frame of reference and setting the terms of discussion. Roger that. 

Expand  

No.  The kids don't set the terms of discussion, the adults do.  No profanity.  No slang.  No insults.  I'm one of those old-fashioned teachers who still likes to have open and honest discussions with the students.  No cancel culture.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/10/2021 at 10:00 PM, David CO said:

No.  The kids don't set the terms of discussion, the adults do.  No profanity.  No slang.  No insults.  I'm one of those old-fashioned teachers who still likes to have open and honest discussions with the students.  No cancel culture.

Expand  

Do you believe there are any "universally agreed upon views" in science or other subjects you teach? If so, may I know a couple? I assume you do not believe the field of psychology falls within the sciences. Correct? Finally, do you have any background or education in neuroscience? I hesitate to conclude that you are informed by ignorance, but I'm getting painted into that corner. I'm struggling to find a reasonable thread to hold with you. As someone who experienced years of "grooming," as defined, and years of study in psychology and sociology examining the "ways" of people and culture, I'm at a loss. 

Edited by ThenNow
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...