POLICY CHANGE, Diversity and Inclusion MB

[AwakeEnergyScouter]

  On 10/16/2023 at 7:30 PM, Mrjeff said:

Because I didn't know there was a time limit.

Expand  

Ok, that addresses the first part. What about the second?

If there's no need the debate "the issue", which is (at least) four issues as per your statement above, then why bring up "the" issue?

[Mrjeff]

  On 10/16/2023 at 6:56 PM, InquisitiveScouter said:

Three possible?  Maybe he did not see that the thread was two months old... it was probably in his Unread queue.

 

Expand  

Because is no concern of yours.  If you carefully red my post I said that was my opinion and it was not open for debate.

[Mrjeff]

  On 10/16/2023 at 6:45 PM, AwakeEnergyScouter said:

Then why did you chime in with this opinion on this thread, two months after the last person said something?

If there's no need the debate "the issue", which is (at least) four issues as per your statement above, then why bring up "the" issue?

I see two possible answers. 

Expand  

Because, Awake, this is a just another attempt to force young people to openly except things that really have no business inn Scouting.

[Mrjeff]

  On 10/16/2023 at 7:32 PM, AwakeEnergyScouter said:

Ok, that addresses the first part. What about the second?

If there's no need the debate "the issue", which is (at least) four issues as per your statement above, then why bring up "the" issue?

Expand  

Because it's something that we're stuck with and will always be there.

[Mrjeff]

I think it's funny when somebody posts something that people don't like, some attack the author, redirect the facts and pretend that they don't understand the meaning.  You know exactly what I mean and it reflects the views of many other Scouters.

[Mrjeff]

Before I get scolded again for being un scout like, I will simply let this drop.

[AwakeEnergyScouter]

@Mrjeff this is all I need to see, thank you.