firstpusk Posted June 4, 2004 Share Posted June 4, 2004 Interesting article. Clearly GW Bush is a legend in his own time... ;^) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packsaddle Posted June 4, 2004 Share Posted June 4, 2004 gsmom, great link! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hops_scout Posted June 4, 2004 Author Share Posted June 4, 2004 I cant get it to work... could somebody just copy/paste it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsmom Posted June 5, 2004 Share Posted June 5, 2004 Hello hops, Try copying and pasting the link into your web browser address line. gsmom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Old Guy Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 It isn't surprising that Bush is not loved by academia, he's not a polished orator and he's not one of them. Clinton is loved by academia because he's one of them. I will always find it amusing that my liberal friends who hated our involvement in Viet Nam belived that we needed to send troops to Bosnia and Somolia but now find our involvement in Iraq to be horribl. Maybe liberals can only support military operations when they don't take too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunt Posted June 6, 2004 Share Posted June 6, 2004 Let me point out that US troops have been in Afghanistan longer than they've been in Iraq, and are still fighting there. And yet few liberals (except the most extreme) objected to invading that country, or have otherwise criticized that operation. I don't get the logic (because there isn't any) that says because I think one war is a bad idea, that I must think the same thing about all wars. Some are bad ideas, and some are good ideas. Unfortunately, leaders who can tell the difference are in short supply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts