scoutmomma Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Now this is different! http://tinyurl.com/6zbq96 http://tinyurl.com/3esnea http://tinyurl.com/63kwmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GernBlansten Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Jehovah's Witness' can't pledge allegiance to the flag. I don't see too many of them as COs or scouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 Does she think that her son might become queen if the crown didn't discriminate against catholics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 The son could never be the royal consort as if he marries and woman in the line of succession, she would lose her place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 Even so, the boy marrying into the line of Royals is about as likely as me marrying Claudia Schiffer. Mom probably has another agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwd-scouter Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 What is the definition of gobsmacked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 Main Entry: gobsmacked Part of Speech: adj Definition: flabbergasted, astounded, shocked; also written gob-smacked Etymology: from gob 'mouth' + smacked 'clapping hand over in surprise' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theysawyoucomin' Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Isn't duty to the Queen more like duty to the nation as a whole with the Queen being the symbol of that nation? If you don't like the Queen move to America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Some would say much more than a symbol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kahuna Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I wouldn't have any problem swearing allegiance to the Queen. Now, if Charles becomes King, that would be another story. I definitely would if he offered me a knighthood. Otherwise . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Oh its not about the individual, but the institution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunny2862 Posted July 2, 2008 Share Posted July 2, 2008 From the third link in the first post "He said: "Someone should explain to Matthew McVeigh that religion has nothing to do with the pledge of allegiance to the Queen. "Catholic Scouts, like all other British Scouts, take this pledge because she is head of state." I think this point is somewhat interesting. The BSA oath from http://www.scouting.org/Media/FactSheets/02-503a.aspx is: On my honor I will do my best To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; To help other people at all times; To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight. We in the States do not pledge to the head of State but to our Country, the Mother in Britain wants the same, also from the same article, "Tracy Anne wants the promise amended to: "I promise to do my duty to God and my country". How many Scouters would have a problem pledging to any of, say, the last 3 Presidents? Or would you see it as pledging to the Office rather than the man as people in our Armed Forces do? And would this flip-flop with Scouters rotating in and out of Scouting as President's and/or political parties change? IF, we had to pledge to the President then I would see it as loyalty to the office and would stay as a consistent member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted July 2, 2008 Share Posted July 2, 2008 "How many Scouters would have a problem pledging to any of, say, the last 3 Presidents? Or would you see it as pledging to the Office rather than the man as people in our Armed Forces do?" I don't know of such pledge members of our armed services take. I never took such an oath to the "Office." Anyway the monarchy is quite different from our transient republican head of state. The monarch technically owns the state, and the government is his/hers. She is the living symbol of the values, heritage, and traditions of the state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunny2862 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 TheScout, Sure you did, if you enlisted, not became an officer,(they have a different oath one can read at the same link below) in the Armed Services of the United States of America. You pledged or affirmed to follow the orders of the President of the United States . You can read it here: http://www.military.com/Recruiting/Content/0,13898,rec_step08_swearing_in,,00.html So if you had enlisted were you saying you would follow orders given by the man or by the office? The common understanding is the office. I think I chose to swear the thing about 7 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I went the officer way - took the Constitution oath. I suppose I was being picking with the enlistment oath. But I would still contend there is a large symbolic difference in the difference between following the orders of the officers appointed by the President in our republican society, and swearing loyalty to the Queen in a monarchy. Our republican head of state remains a transient figure representing a political party and has never come closes to being the sovereign owner and personification of the state as a monarch does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now