k9gold-scout Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2635130120080327 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Right decision. Wrong reason. The federal courts shound have declined to even hear this case. The 10th Amendment does say: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Obviously this includes the right to put up any monument one wishes. The federal government has better things to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlyn_LeRoy Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 This was one of the monuments put up to promote the movie "The Ten Commandments," so apparently public property can now be used to promote religious movies. I can't wait for "Allah Akbar" to be made and demands for equal movie promotion hit the courts. Plus, of course, all those flying spaghetti monster monuments: http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=55995(This message has been edited by Merlyn_LeRoy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevorum Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 That is just noodly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evmori Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 And who does it harm? No one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GernBlansten Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Isn't this that activist 9th Circuit Court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSScout Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 How many commandments? http://www.downes.ca/post/113 Or is it eleven? Or 613?(This message has been edited by SSScout) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 This was one of the monuments put up to promote the movie "The Ten Commandments," Huh? Some civic group ran around promoting a movie? The movie was released in 1956, the monument went up in 1959. Sounds like a bad marketing department to me, promoting a movie three years after its release. Do you have a citation? Of course you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 "But the 9th Circuit panel said it did not agree, especially because no complaints were received for more than 30 years after the monument was erected." I like this. Basically it says, "it's been there, just leave it alone." "How many commandments?" Most of those are interpretations or extensions of the primary ten. Kind of like how we have laws that say, "Teens can't carry concealed guns" but they have to pass a new law that says "teens can't carry concealed guns at school" and then one that says "not only are teens not allowed to carry guns at school but they aren't allowed to shoot people either, especially at school." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novice_Cubmaster Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Actually, Judaism identifies 613 separate commandments in the Torah (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers & Deuteronomy). These aren't extrapolations on the "big 10" from Mt Sinai; many have to do with temple rituals, some are dietary, others are more civil/legal. I believe the 1st injunction in the Torah that's regarded as a commandment is "Be fruitful and multiply". But I doubt you'll see a monument put up that says, "Put down that pork chop & go be fruitful". NC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlyn_LeRoy Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Yes, of course I have a cite Gold Winger; most of the 10 commandment monuments were put up by the fraternal order of eagles, and this is almost certainly one of them. http://www.foe.com/events/ten-commandments.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevorum Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Well, technically, the FoE markers weren't erected to promote the movie. Rather, they sort of rode on the coattails of the movie's success. Back in the 50s and 60s, few people were objecting to this type of mish-mash of religion and government. It was a different era. Eventually, people started speaking up. One of the chief objections to the BoE markers (other than being on publically owned property) was the florid artwok that mixed together national symbols (flags, eagles, etc) with religious ones (Star of David, Chi-Rho) as contect for the 10, as if there was no real difference. That was the problem - the appearance of official endorsement of the Judeo Christian religion by the Government. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ten_Commandments_Monument.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
le Voyageur Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 Another nail in the coffin for secularism. The big question..... Who's religion will dominate as the offical State religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScout Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 It seems quite clear that if you were to have a state religion it would be Christianity . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Winger Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 (This message has been edited by a staff member.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now