OldGreyEagle Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 I am so confused! The Where: BSA National Headquarters The What: Seems to be that possesion of Kiddie Porn instantly equals a guilty party The When: is that the BSA should have fired Smith after they learned of the investigation but before any legal charges were made. Now, it has happened that possesion of Kiddie Porn is not always treated as a criminal act and if BSA fired an employee before all the facts were in, it still would have been a PR fiasco. The Who? Pete Townsend You Better, You better, you bet(This message has been edited by OldGreyEagle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evmori Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 OGE, You gotta be kidding! Sure Pete did the same thing, I think. But if I'm not mistaken, his crime occurred in England. Smith was in charge of YP for the Boy Scouts of America & the purveyor of kiddie porn on the side. Notice any sort of conflict there? Are you suggesting what Smith did was OK & should be overlooked? Ed Mori Troop 1 1 Peter 4:10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FScouter Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 You'd think from comments here that he was given a promotion, a raise, and a big bonus. He could have been tarred and feathered on the spot and still there would be those bellyaching that BSA didn't do enough soon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldGreyEagle Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 as Ed often says The humor impaired have arrived!(This message has been edited by OldGreyEagle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now