scoutingagain Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 "...it certainly creates fresh new ground for lawsuits, if nothing else. " If that's the case, perhaps the bill should be renamed the Save our Scouts and Employ Our Constitutional Lawyers Act. SA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunt Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 NJ, I see your point, but I think the legislation was written in a cagy way to allow DOD to say that their directive was simply reminding units of a constitutional limitation, and thus did not make a change. I think what this bill is trying to head off (assuming anybody really intends to try to pass it) is efforts to exclude Scouting from access to government facilities (i.e., Jamboree) on the grounds that it is discriminatory. But I don't disagree that somebody might run with the interpretation you suggest. I predict, however, that the bill will sink into procedural obscurity and fade from memory. It's already served its primary purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTBoyScout101 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 I recommend that all who have not yet signed the petition should do so now! www.grassfire.org "Save Our Scouts Petition" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now