littlek Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 Hello All! We have an ADL who still has not completed any training asked/required of him. He is a very active leader who brings excitement to den meetings and the boys like him. The problem runs deeper though. It is an almost pathologic disregard for any sensible saftey or control of situation efforts. His comments are usually to the tone of 'Let the boys be boys'. That's fine as long as they aren't being boys in the back of a moving pick-up truck, (latest effort on his part). He is at times a loose cannon and I as a new CM have little time to spend keeping him under control. The Committe consensus is to 'fire' him. Any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndaigler Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 littlek, Welcome!!!! It's easy to be appreciated by elementary school kids when you act as if you have the same level of responsibility. He has to change! The trick of course is to make him see that being careful and appropriate doesn't have to truly damage the level of fun the boys have. You said he's an ADL, what's the DL doing? Would he be better suited as an Activities Chair for the whole Pack? Advancement Chair? Is training mandated by your CO? It sounds like he could be beneficial in the right role with the right controls -- but the greater good and the greater safety are more important and more urgent. I'm sure you'll get some great ideas in the next day or two - in the meantime, I'll keep thinking. jd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob White Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 How about creating a position of Loss Prevention Chairman. Put him in charge of safety. Arm him with the G2SS, send him to BALOO, have him learn about the BSA accident insurance coverage and explain it to the parents, have him organize the Youth Protection training for the youth and the adults, have him help find presenters on fire safety, woods tools, first aid, home safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madkins007 Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 I think I'd take him aside (or have another leader he respects and works well with do this) and explain the dilemma- 'We love having you around and the Scouts love you, but there are some rules and safety guidelines we HAVE to operate under. You can learn about them at training, or read the Guide to Safe Scouting and Cub Leaders Handbook to learn about them, but you've really got to get on board with us about safety. Neither of us wants the Scouts hurt, or to deal with an upset parent over something.' If your pack has an internal expectation of training (as you ought), mention that as well- along with whatever you do to encourage it (like paying for it out of the treasury). If that does not help, try to find another position that he can help with and have less interaction in risky situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkfrance Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 We had a Tiger Leader with a similar attitude last year. He went to New Leader Essentials and talked thru the whole thing. Never went back for anything else. "Can't understand why we are so uptight about everything. That's not the way it was in Canada." He also had an issue with women in control. (Our CC and UC are both women). Gee, unfortunately, he got a better job and won't be in a position to be a Leader for us this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubmaster Mike Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Riding in the back of a pickup has been illegal for years here in CA. I like Bobwhite's idea, but you don't need to make a position. Give him a copy of the G2SS and have him review each activity in advance to make sure that it is safe. You'll need to do so yourself and if he shrugs it off and says it is safe (when you know it isn't) then suggest things like, "OK but let's check under Chapter X. I remember seeing smething there...." He should get the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlek Posted July 14, 2005 Author Share Posted July 14, 2005 Thanks for your input on this matter. The COR, CC, and I agree that his days as a leader working directly with the boys are limited unless we see some clear signs of change. He will be reminded of the opportunity to take training and be on some sort of probation and/or offered a committee position, as Bob White suggested. He probably would not accept a committee position and it will be tough to get him trained. My concern is with him removing his son out of spite. It is not fair to the boy, but we must have some safety and order for the other kids. Im going to show my ignorance, (dont look ;-}), what is the G2SS that you refer to Bob? Thanks k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynda J Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 GUIDE TO SAFE SCOUTING YOU HAVE TO GET THIS GUY EITHER TRAINED OR OUT. Only options. You have to accept that if a child gets injured and it is through his negligence that it will be you and the Charter Org that could be sued. THey do not sue BSA. You are putting yourself, your boys and your Pack in danger each time you allow this guy to do anything unsafe with the boys. If he refuses to get trained then you have no option but to let him go. Would be the same if you knowingly allow boys to ride with a driver that you knew had no drivers license. Remember it is SAFETY FIRST. As far as him removing his son out of spite. That may very well happen. But you can not endanger the other boys because of it.(This message has been edited by Lynda J) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbng Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 G2SS is shorthand for Guide to Safe Scouting. This is a very important resource, and it may just solve some of the problems you are facing. Every activity should be planned following the G2SS as well as the Age-Appropriate Guidelines. Also, if you are unsure of what is guideline and what is policy, within the G2SS policy is in bold print. Also, the Cub Scout Leader Handbook covers many policies. As CM, I highly recommend that you have copies of these. The G2SS and age-appropriate guidelines are online: http://www.scouting.org/boyscouts/resources/18-260/index.html http://www.scouting.org/pubs/gss/index.html(This message has been edited by bbng) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlek Posted July 15, 2005 Author Share Posted July 15, 2005 I figured out G2SS about an hour after I posted. Thanks! Lynda, that is where we are at in our discussion with him. No train = no boy contact. I prefer no training = no leadership position. We have been able to keep him from engaging in the activities that HE deems safe. We are not sure if there have been things that have not been noticed and stopped. Does BSA provide any type of liability insurance to CO? Does it cover COR, CC, CM or other pack leaders? Maybe I need to spin this thread off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob White Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 The BSA provides liabilty protection for the CO and any registered adult, however it is important that all related BSA policies be followed in order to insure that the protection will be in-force. A leader who ignores any BSA safety regulations can jeopardize that protection.(This message has been edited by Bob White) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsRgr8 Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 And that includes getting a tour permit (signed by a committee member AND the council) each and every time this leader has any cub scout (other than his son) in his vehicle! Of course, the same rule applies to all drivers (registered leaders or volunteer parents), not just this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoreaScouter Posted July 16, 2005 Share Posted July 16, 2005 In my experience, the volunteers who would benefit most from the training (read: need it most) are the least likely to go to training of their own volition. Unfortunately, more common in the Cub program and the cause of most of our youth losses, too. When I was a Cubmaster, my first priority was to get DLs and ADLs trained and operating legally. I laid it on the table at recruiting night, and we had Pack-level trainers if they couldn't make it to District or Council-level training. Gotta do it in September. Training in January is useless -- all the bad habits are now institutionalized, and your losses have already occurred (and, all those families who quit will spend the rest of their lives telling their friends how "broke" Scouting is). I would "unvolunteer" a DL in a second if they didn't get with the program. When I was a Pack committee chair, it was the same thing. I was forced to relieve a Cubmaster and Treasurer in the same year; turbulent, but necessary. In that regard, I'm way more "Dr. Phil" than I am "Oprah". BTW, you need your committee and CO behind you 100%. Colin Powell once said that "a good leader can't walk past a mistake". If you know this volunteer is running his own extemporaneous routine, you have to redirect his energies or send him to your neighborhood soccer team... KS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now