eisely Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Clearly removal is a last resort, but it needs to be on the table as at least a possibility. There are scouts who merely want to get their tickets punched on the trail to eagle. This is where the problem with the national limitation on "active" becomes problematic. If the more cynical scouts and their parents believe that all they need to do is stay registered and get themselves named for a POR, we have created a "moral hazard" that will provide an incentive for the kind of behavior we wish to prevent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now