Double Eagle

This is in reference to SSScout. I was in a similar situation when called by the Scout Exec and Council Commissioner to go from ADC to Dist Commish. My first question is what happened to the current Dist Commish? He was going to cross lanes and become the new District Chair. That was the good part as I let it be known that I would not be part of bumping him out unless voluntarily. I think it is poor business to not give the interim person the opportunity first, unless there is just cause.

For mrjpohns2, that is rather interesting concept rather than a national rule I think. Imagine being a district key 3 and signing up the next year's key 3 for all kinds of things they have no knowledge or interest in. It often takes more than a year to understand the mechanics of district, service area, or council after merges, realignment, and new units added. A new advancement chair each year would be interesting to see that work successfully. And then...you must have a bench of volunteers ready to step up/in. Not a fan of mandatory 1yr term limits in any unit or level.

For Tron, you do reference local policies. The lodge advisor term and dues paying parent is local. One dangerous situation is when the lodge chief and advisor are in the same household. It can be friction whether the conversation is from parent/youth or chief/advisor. You are correct on the 1year term on district/council positions, but no term limits by national. From a commissioner standpoint, a couple awards require 3yrs of a 5yr periods.

Worst case, the supreme chief of the fire (council executive) could give the nudge. The lodge advisor would be the one to address this with a chapter advisor. Yup, I've been both. If the lodge has an upcoming lodge leader development, it would be a good time for associate lodge advisor(s) and adults to address this in an adult forum. I'd give a mentor or friend of the individual a chance to talk sense. Maybe with a long tenure, it is time for new roles or new blood into that area.

Since Eagledad brought up the ticket items, I'd like to see them too. I've been troop guide and ASPL for WB, so learner's course makes it 3 WB courses in 3 different councils. Ticket writing was the worst part for troop guides and participants. One course wanted them to cure cancer and save BSA in every way. I'm not a fan of the dancing, so glad to see it went away. Critter pride is not emphasized as much either, but always an Eagle and honorary Fox (red dog).

Just to get back to the question, my experience with lone scouts has been overseas where no BSA presence was. We used the local embassy for assistance as the scout had a parent working at the embassy. As for which council or national level to work with, is a question. Some lone scouts use the Far East Council for resources when in their footprint. Another time we had lone scouts in remote Alaska as units were really few and far between. I also have the international scouter award knot and earned the international scouter patch shown above (the blue one). If you ever get a chance, Kandersteg International Scout Center in Switzerland is awesome, winter or summer.

Trying to be brief on this. UC is a district level position as stated by Fred8033. The appointing authority (differs often between councils) for unit commissioners should not assign (in my.scouting.org) his UC duties in a unit he is part of. UC ideally should have 3-5 units assigned to them. UC visiting unit meetings may be needed if a reported problem exists, but 99% of the time are invited. UC should be a coach, teacher, mentor, and doctor for units and mostly adults/committees. Commissioners should stress the Journey to Excellence scoresheet as a thermometer for units to self-assess before a detailed assessment (minimum 2 per year) and simple assessments (done after almost every UC-units contact) are done by a commissioner. Short version: That UC should not hold a position in the same unit assigned to him.

Haven't heard of a council without commissioners. I know finding unit commissioners is pretty tough these days. Heck, Eagle Scouts are easier to find. Having been a commissioner since 2001, I've seen ups and downs between the 11 councils I've worked with. I would like to see a reason for more interest in the service. We also had commissioners on paper that did nothing. That didn't help the image of commissioners either.

How about a good look at the "Journey to Excellence" worksheet and head towards at least a Bronze rating? All those KPI can be ok, but wouldn't an advancement rep best report from their seat? SM is not a committee and should stick to SM stuff while committee can dig deep into expenses, advancement, recruiting. Pretty much the team while the SM is quarterback.

I"m sure this camp falls under a council. How about bringing it up to the council board. Just not going is good for your unit, but leaves the same problem that would fill your troop's week. How about identifying the troop to council and camp that took over the latrine. I'm more of the thinking Scouts can be courteous, but not a weak victim and just take it on the chin. Standing up for yourself and others is scout like too...brave? And to those leaders on the site (I hope they contribute) that condone taking over the latrine, you allowed Scouts to show an ugly side of shared camping and will be used as a negative example for some time.

My point about rangers and staff is they still have to be registered, even if a unit has several adults. Anyone on troop overnighters have to be registered and YPT. Not looking for the 2-deep piece, but rather who are authorized to stay on overnight events.

The big thinkers in the site are digging into this area, thanks. As a Scouter not in a unit, registered and YPT District Staff only, I have accompanied camping Troops when they lacked a registered Scouter. I fit the requirement and we had the campout. Otherwise, the unit would have cancelled the campout due to lack of adults. I'll have to ask the council the question on whether it has to be any BSA registered and YPT adult, or one registered to a specific unit only. Seems kinda dumb to be a "unit-specific-only" restriction (restriction used lightly). If unit-registered-adult only, I wonder how they work summer camp and the High Adventure Bases with guides, rangers, and staff that may accompany troops on overnighters. Philmont Rangers is a good question as they stay multiple nights with treks.

Its a wonder what shop decision makers do at the BSA. Seems the OA bolo tie is discontinued. This is not a positive, but rather a negative for any future arrowmen (loose term). On-line Scoutshop only shows 6 bolos available, 3 are commissioner ones. They do carry expensive Osprey backpacks and expensive knives no adult would risk taking on a campout. Seems the days of scouts getting national-branded gear and items is in the past. Shame as I remember when every scout had a BSA mess kit, canteen, Camillus or Ulster knife, and a vit'l kit. Old timers had the red wool coats (still available) and campaign hat. SMH at how Scouting has become a rich-kid game and scouts rely on cheap-quality, new stuff, or buy "vintage" items to get what they need.

I was hinting at this in my second paragraph. Overnighters is the easy explaination. Unregistered adults attending troop events, whether day trips or things like bowl-a-thons, have been a hot discoussion point within our council. When in doubt, get the paid Scouters to advise.

I'm hoping this follows the lines of bearskin rugs. Where I live and hunt bears, few people ever place their bearskins on the floor to be walked on. They go on walls to be admired and treasured. Maybe those will be seen the same way. Shameful to think our flag would be walked upon and feet wiped on it.