InquisitiveScouter

Wait... what is this "patrol" thing you speak of??? LOL

I have never witnessed the inner workings of this "meatgrinder" or "professional proficiency" you speak of. What do you mean by this, say, with reference to specific skills?? Are you referring to a Troop which tests Scouts multiple times, or where, during an SM conference, the SM tests skills and refuses to sign off that conference unless the Scout demonstrates proficiency? I have heard of units like that, but either they do not last long, or the adults who create that climate move on fairly quickly and the pendulum moves toward the model (or swings past to the "anything can get signed off." ) The requirements themselves demand some level of proficiency... For example, the First Class requirement to demonstrate a square lashing... it had better start with a clove hitch on one pole, have three full wraps which alternate inside and outside of the previous wraps, two full fraps, and end with a clove hitch on the other pole. All this is according to the Scout Handbook. If it doesn't have those elements, it's not a square lashing, and that doesn't get signed off. I note that the description of "The Four Steps of Advancement" in the Scout Handbook says, in step "2. You are tested: Once you feel that you have mastered a skill, a leader tests you..." [emphasis added] That might be where some people go off the deep end... the word mastery is very subjective, and means different things to different people. But, I find the word "mastery" in no requirements themselves.

Yes. And have seen stuff like this for years... like, starting in the mid to late 1990's. It falls in line with some council-run Summer Camp merit badge "mill" models many have created. (Some camps are known for this (ours) and are packed with Scouts each year.) Not unusual for a Scout to do a week of camp here and walk away with 8 to 11 MBs... And still not know how to tie a taut line hitch 😜, fold a flag, start a fire, identify some common animals and plants, swim 100 yards (much less float and pass the Swimmer check), read a map, use a compass, measure 100 yards, know the difference between frostbite and hypothermia, or the difference between heat exhaustion and heat stroke (or treatment for any of the four) etc. etc. etc. If councils will not run a program with integrity, units will follow suit... We have a Troop of about 45 Scouts... less than 20% of them come to me when they want to learn a skill and get signed off. But those Scouts know their stuff, and are the ones approved by the SM to sign off other Scouts. The other 80+% have other leaders they will seek out for sign offs, because they know they'll get it easy. (The leaders knowledge is Fair to Poor also... but, hey! they did IOLS!!) The really sad part is, I adhere to the mantra: "The requirements, and nothing more! The requirements, and nothing less!"

OK, so 2024 is 388,941 for Scouts. A ~1% drop from 2023, (but probably including the numbers covered by the grace period??) Cub Scout numbers from 2023: 574,365 2024: 589,253 a ~2.6% increase. Let's hope that is reality, because Cubs is the primary feeder for Scouts.

Other than "lawyer" and "Scout", what names did I call you, pray tell? Upon further reexamination, I retract both.

Well, your legal analysis is shoddy. You have assumed the parents' intent without any knowledge other than the OP. And cast several other aspersions on them without any verifiable facts. As a lawyer, you should know better. As a Scout, you should be ashamed.

And I'll bet you the BSA Annual Report had numbers as of year end, which would include those under the grace period... that is, people who did not pay their renewal fees under the new system, but were being carried on the rolls anyway. So, whenever we do get to see the 2024 Annual Report, you could probably cut those numbers by 20-25% to get closer to reality.

I wasn't making that comparison, but was showing the effects of hiding numbers with a "grace" period. But, since you asked... From Apr 24 to Apr 25: Cub Scout: 2.4% loss, with a loss of 8 Packs Scout: 5.7% loss, with a loss of 8 Troops Venturing: 49% loss, with a loss of 1 Crew (it was a big and popular Crew) Exploring: 11% loss, with a loss of 3 Posts

BTW, 2019 numbers for Scouts: 798,516 2023 numbers for Scouts: 392,275 A 50.87% loss over four years... ouch Prepare for an even more loss for 2024...

Good luck finding it... I looked for about 20 minutes, with no success. I'm sure you'll share when able P.S. Last one posted on BSA website?? 2019 https://www.scoutingnewsroom.org/about-the-bsa/annual-reports/ Although, you can view 2023's here... https://www.scouting.org/about/annual-report/ But scan through the links... what's with not putting them up after 2019?

OK, the numbers are in.... Look at the numbers hidden by the "grace" period.... As of end of March 2025 (3 days ago) our council, compared to Dec 2024: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 6% Scouts Growth Rate, gain slightly more 7% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 10% Exploring Growth Rate, gain of almost 28% Overall, Total Growth Rate gain of slightly less than 1% Now, three days later, with the grace period expired, looking at comparison to Dec 2024 numbers: Cub Scout Growth Rate, loss of almost 25% Scouts Growth Rate, loss of almost 15% Venturing Growth Rate, loss of almost 49% Exploring Growth Rate, loss of slightly more than 11% Overall, Total Growth Rate loss of almost 20% (Exact numbers and percentages not posted, to protect the innocent 😜 )

Maybe we could counsel the MB with a Scout playing these:

Programs like this are indeed legit. Do not contact anyone at council until you thoroughly understand all the info below. OK, going through your post item by item... "We have a scenario right now where a registered parent of a scout has donated money (say $500) through a company's Charitable Matching program they have. It's a big banking company and the program is legit. They expected the money to be matched, then when the company matched it and sent a check through our chartered church to our troop as a $1000 (for example)." Let's verify who the actual donees are first. To whom did the parents write their check? Was the check made out to Troop X or some other recipient? To whom did the Company make out their portion, AND, to which Employer Identification Number (EIN) did they credit the donation? (This info should be on their check or the check stub (or some accompanying letter.) These company programs may only make the donations to a legitimate 501 c (3) charity, and each charity has an IRS assigned EIN. You can try to find the EIN / Charitable Organization using this tool: https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/ Make sure the EIN matches the CO name. Now, if the Bank put in the EIN for your local council, or the National council, then you have a problem. The money then technically belongs to the council, or whoever is listed by EIN on the check. [Your Troop is most likely not registered as a 501 c(3). It could be.] Let's assume for a second that everything is as it should be... that is, 1) Your unit is not a separate charitable org. 2) the parent check was written to Troop X, and 3) the bank check indicates the EIN for your CO. If these are true, then that money technically belongs to the CO. Did you or anyone inform/coordinate this donation with the CO? Does the Treasurer for the CO understand that this donation is to be used for the Troop? There are other details involved with this, but let's leave it at that for the moment. What the parent proposes, giving the donation money solely for the use of their Scout, is ILLEGAL!!! Do not, under any circumstances do this. As @Tron points out, there is a principal the IRS looks at called Inurement (or private benefit) https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/inurement-private-benefit-charitable-organizations If your unit gives any of this donated money (either the check from the parent's or the matched bank donation, as the two amounts are "tied" together) to only that Scout, then you violate federal law, specifically the Internal Revenue Code passed by Congress. In doing so you also would place your CO's charitable organization status in jeopardy! One way you could use the money is to give each and every Scout an equal share of the total sum, and credit those in Scoutbook. But, even that could present problems if the amounts are large. The IRS has given NO specific guidance on this. So, if the equal share for each Scout was $25, no one would blink an eye at that. If the equal share for each Scout is $2500, then you are in troubled waters... Here are some related threads you might read to gain a more fulsome understanding. If you need more specificity on this, and you are not comfortable posting information here, you may DM me... Regards

Off to a Troop meeting, but will chime in on this later. Tread carefully... And no, the money does not go to the Scout... yikes

Agreed. I think BSA was hoist by its own petard on this one. The focus of Summer Camp is, generally, the merit badge program. This is a mistake, because it turned the focus to Advancement. And then, to do it on the cheap, camps hire 15 & 16 year olds to teach MBs, when this inherently violates the "spirit" of what the MB program is about. (This is where you can go down the rabbit hole of the responsibilities of unit leaders and "actual" merit badge counselors as well...) Summer Camp is a "pay your fee, get your degree." operation. On the whole, we have a huge integrity problem when it comes to Summer Camps and the Merit Badge program. Parents, Scouts staffs, unit leaders, paid professionals, National... all complicit. This is one of our biggest "dirty little secrets." I used to work with Scouts after camp to go through their MBs and ask them how they completed the requirements. Many, many times, I got the answer "Oh, we didn't do that one." or "My counselor said we didn't have to do that." or some such response. After working with Scouts to correct, I filed quite a few of these: https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/512-800_WB.pdf Know what became of them? Nothing... ignored

They know who the "academic" or "paper" Eagle Scouts are, too. "If the minimums weren't good enough, they wouldn't be the minimums." I do not like that way of doing business, but the world is full of folks who accept that currency.

One of the primary reasons the organization is failing, IMO.

Nor will it... always remember the warped view that the paid staff of the organization take of you: you are expendable, and the image of the council/national/brand must be protected. (Even if they are in the wrong of the situation, and you are in the right...integrity doesn't matter)

LO Repeat after me... Summer Camp at the Summit https://www.summitbsa.org/scout-camp/

LOL... that seemed to be their interpretation. But, correlation is not causation...

And many are still in the grace period. They will not renew, and have not dropped off the rosters yet.

Rovers

For those folks, I listen, and then hand them this official Troop complaint form... https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/524-501.pdf

I think BSA should drop the age limit. This deadline causes so much unneeded frustration for families and Scouts, and a rush to get it done, cutting corners, and detracting from the experience. If we want to create a great outdoor experience, we do not need to overlay the pressure of doing it for an award you are going run out of time getting. This would also help integrate Scouts with different needs (I do not like the phrase "special needs") who need more time to complete things.

Don't think most would survive the scrutiny...