-
Posts
1150 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Store
Everything posted by mrjohns2
-
Thinking beyond the box and NOT fearing legal issues?
mrjohns2 replied to skeptic's topic in Issues & Politics
I’m not following your point. In your council activities are not done due to fear of legal repercussions? Probably the biggest legal hardship for our camps is the requirement of a sprinkler system for buildings housing more than 4 unrelated people (or something like that). Due to that new cabins will be tough in the future. -
Seems very low key vs the photo shoots of the past few years.
-
Councils With No Commissioners
mrjohns2 replied to Scoutmaster Teddy's topic in Open Discussion - Program
I do see a pretty high overlap in our council between commissioners and the district committee. Not in the work, but the people. -
Are full face snorkel masks banned?
mrjohns2 replied to MrJZhu's topic in Equipment Reviews & Discussions
-
Are full face snorkel masks banned?
mrjohns2 replied to MrJZhu's topic in Equipment Reviews & Discussions
I knew I had read it before. 2021 National Aquatics Newsletter. It says in all BSA activities. Is it not in the G2SS? I didn’t look. Here is where it says they are banned: https://www.scouting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Aquatics-Subcommittee-eNewsletter-20210601.pdf -
My.Scouting Error Message with changing Functional Roles
mrjohns2 replied to Alec27's topic in Advancement Resources
Wait. What? Election? It seems like they did an update with having expiration dates and a) didn’t update any documentation b) roll it out and c) it is full of confusing interface and bugs. Your council office can enter a ticket for the error you are seeing. You can’t. 😞 -
Beyond moving the current CC to USR and the new CC into the CC slot. Yes, they will sit as Unit Scouter reserve until recharter or their membership expires if they aren’t going to re-up in general.
-
Chapter 11 announced - Part 14 - Plan Effective
mrjohns2 replied to MYCVAStory's topic in Issues & Politics
Does this mean higher payouts? Or that the payouts planned will be fully funded? -
Bear Grylls ending his role as UK Chief Scout
mrjohns2 replied to RememberSchiff's topic in Scouting Around the World
I’d like Jocko Willink. He would be awesome. Or maybe that is just me. Mr Beast? 🙂 -
I'm not following. After you change them in my.scouting, it is best then to go and end them in Scoutbook.
-
They could. The volunteer corp, for the most part, just gives each other awards vs. really doing the heavy lifting many would be willing to do.
-
This is the way. Then go to Scoutbook and end their positions there.
-
They were PDFs before, but choose to charge for them on Amazon. Like @InquisitiveScouter pointed out, plenty of BSA info is a pdf or on a Website. They aren’t motivated or capable of keeping them updated.
-
agreed
-
Agreed. That concept should no longer be done. I’m not in support of coed troops, but I am also not in support of girl only camporees or summer camp weeks.
-
I’ve enjoyed Scout On Chattanooga. https://www.cherokeeareabsa.com/podcast . A lot is hyper local, but I like their chemistry enough to listen. I was irritated with Scouter Stan when he specifically gave out incorrect uniform advice. If I recall it might have been a recruiter strip for adults and maybe a district patch.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Yes? That do that with the counselor. That counselor may end up not being an adult. It is up to the council advancment committe (see other parts of the guide to advancement) to manage the quality of the summer camp mb program. I can assure you that about 90% of MBs am nation wide are taught by counselors under 18. Have you been to camp? Have you assured yourself and your scouts of quality instruction? I have. If you have, you’d know that the requirements are done with an MBC that is more likely than not under 18. You must be new to the program to have this all jumbled up.
-
Actually, that isn't true. If so, all counselors would need to be 18. They oversee quality control to make sure those that are teaching the MB are holding to the standards, but the adult is not expected to test each scout on each requirement. Just not part of the program or expectations.
-
This makes sense as it would allow a leader to say "yes, we have an RSO, we have a rifle instructor, and we are at a commercial range". Just like safe swim defense or climbing, they could confirm that they are setup to meet the requirements vs. just saying "well, these are guys who do shooting normally at district events, so they know best".
-
When the Scout admits it. Your example of a Scout admitting they didn't read the requirements is a pretty poor judge if they did them or not. If swimming merit badge at camp covers certain requirements each day, the counselor tracks completion, and when done, done. There isn't a requirement for the Scout to read the requirements, just do them. And it should be rare. Rare. Not a regular occurrence. It sounds like for your unit, this was a regular occurrence. Your sense of righteousness seems strong. Again "Just as we avoid penalizing Scouts for the mistakes of adults, it should be a rare occurrence that a unit leader finds the need to question whether merit badges have been earned." This isn't to be done with each badge with each scout. That doesn't seem how you describe your process.
-
This isn't an opinion, it is policy. If the blue card is signed by the counselor, then the scout has earned it. Your "beef" is with the camp / counselor, the scout should still be awarded the badge.
-
Well, I’m not sure about programs, but I am pretty sure my daughter (and other Scouts) in our troop wouldn’t have stepped up and spoken up with boys in their troop.
-
Tell that to those that went to the Jamboree. I’d like to see how the next WILL be a quality program vs 2023’s meh program.
-
You can’t convince me now because all it ends up being is a name change. Money and time spent. How about some plans? Some actions to really move the needle? And I don’t mean the plans / actions around renaming. Renaming is easy. Success is assured with the renaming. Plans can and will be completed. Growing numbers is hard. How about a review of the 5 year plan and where we are at? Like another said, basically failed.