mrjohns2

I love your philosophy. So many make it super serious and hard to achieve some crazy unarticulated vision of the course director.

I try to be super duper involved, but also try to think I may have to walk away if needed. I don’t want to be so invested that I feel like I CANT walkway. It may be the healthiest thing to do if push came to shove.

Yeah, that was the conclusion in the article (Nationals? APs?). I’m not so sure about that.

"According to court documents, the boat's propeller struck Keoni while he was swimming in the lake."

I’m confused about the downtick in boys. Too bad there are good exit interviews. I am very confused by the membership increase. The renewal system has been an utter failure. Are they just counting everyone who renewed, and could renew, as members?

Gotta read the whole post “At this point, I'm thinking maybe just wait until he has two more activities done, then mark the requirement as done?”

The internet is a tough place out there. If you are wondering, this is why I have a concern with your post. Because the previous troop used different software you will have the scout wait? Preposterous. The requirements are done.

Very clearly states after you go to a 6 year old document and follow a couple of other tortuous paths. Sure it is required. Yep.

😞 Scout involvement / satisfaction is inversely proportional to the program being like school. Scouts didn't sign up for night school! As a nerd, I loved it. So, if we want to only appeal to the 1 in 15 or 1 in 30, keep it up!

Where is it in the registration guidebook? Also, do you have a copy? The 2024 edition came out, but has been only posted internally for registrars. Would like to have a copy.

That was my search findings. It makes a little bit of sense - accept government money, you must be transparent to how the money is used.

Well, maybe? Not really? Have you been in the same council? Scouting IDs are not portable, so to see my eagle (and NESA life), I had to find my youth ID. Pretty neat they had it from 1990. Other registrations? No.

G. Michael Hopf

IF they are subject to FOIA, it would only be in relation to how the grants are used. Not "in general".

Then they moved it to 90 and then 120 days. Not sure what it is now. 90?