HashTagScouts

I'm glad you'll welcome comments. Membership started steady decline after 1999. Gay youth were not openly admitted until after 2013. How do you explain those years? “Good riddance,” SmartyPants might say. But the straight kid’s smile is the same as the trans kid’s smile when he learns to swim. But the straight kid is not at camp. Momma said, “Sorry kiddo. We’re not doing that.” 1 - 9 = -8. Don’t erase boys. Apparently, your presumption is that gay youth are not "real boys". As a youth, my son was a Scout. My son is an Eagle Scout, Vigil Honor recipient, spent years on camp staff, spent years as NYLT staff, Lodge officer, served stints as Den Chief, Quartermaster, Scribe, ASPL, and SPL for his troop. My son is also bi-sexual. He never hid that, it was never an issue that he felt was a necessary topic within Scouting and felt the same for anyone who is straight/gay/bi. That is who he is, and he who he has always been. Period. I would say your "smiles at the waterfront", while holding a bigoted view of those youth when you are away from the waterfront is far more of a problem than someone like my son having been a part of the BSA.

We may make more of that than is needed, just because many of us were around before and after the change, and we're more trying to find our own way on how adjust. Each country has their own flavor on how they have set up their program, but the comparable program to what many of us have known as "Cub Scouts" and "Boy Scouts" are just "Cub Scouts" and "Scouts" to them. Scouts UK Scouts Canada Squirrel Scouts 4-5 years Beaver Scouts 5-7 years Beaver Scouts 6-7 years Cub Scouts 8-10 years Cub Scouts 8-10.5 years Scouts 11-14 years Scouts 10.5-14 years Venturer Scouts 15-17 years Explorers 15-17 years Rover Scouts 18-26 years Network members 18-25 years Scouts Mexico Scouts Brazil Cub Scouts 6-9 years Cub Scouts 6.5-10 years Scouts 10-13 years Scouts 11-14 years Walkers 14-17 years Senior Scouts 15-17 years Rovers 18-21 years Pioneers 18-21 years

We'll get t-shirts and hang out in the lobby

I was thinking they were just not putting Venturing/Sea Scouts and Exploring on the plot line, but that was where the difference in the final numbers were. Slide 16, if expected total membership = 1,500,000 for 2028. Slide 17 Cub Scouts and Scouts BSA = $1,380,858 for 2028. Then expecting Venturing/Sea Scouts and Exploring to grow from ~37,000 in 2024 to 119,142 in 2028 I guess? The math ain't mathing.

The programs are still good. Locations are the issue. Nearly every lodge in our section would have several youth attend each year. Aside from one weekend in New Jersey, the next closest one for our Region is in Nashville, TN.

And you'd pretty much be shown the door... It was why I left. For the National org, they ultimately need to take a giant step back and re-evaluate what they do. I know that there was a lot of hand-wringing last year that NOAC attendance in TN didn't meet expectations (and looks to be the same this year in CO), and that NLS attendance has been a concern. Well, maybe having NOAC at a large university is no longer the need, and maybe a mid-sized university (or even Summit) is better. You won't quite have the hotels for staff and air-con dorms for youth attendees, but that isn't really the important part... As for NLS, under the new two-region structure, it's a great distance for many to attend. We used to rely on only having to go as far as NJ from New England for NLS (and got fortunate that at times they would hold one a year somewhere in New England). Now they want folks to travel to Pittsburgh, Maryland, Alabama, etc. Sorry, NLS is good, but it ain't that good that I'd spend $1,000 on airfare to travel for it, nor ask a teenager to do so.

During my time as Committee Chair, the UC would meet with me and the SM when they visited during a weekly troop meetings. Anything related to the unit, and what assistance we could use on items such as recruitment or program, we would discuss with the UC and bring back to the Troop committee as needed. A good UC is primarily focused on what the Council is doing and how the Council can support the unit, not how the sausage is being made at the unit level. In other words, the UC is not there there to be an HR manager and oversee every individual unit leader, they are there to be a coach to the unit leader to get the optimal outcome for the unit to flourish. Council (and by extension of the Council organization as fitting, District) should provide a UC to each unit, but it is not that each unit should provide a UC. UCs within our district do serve multiple units. Some may serve units that they used to belong with, but by-and-large those who serve as UCs generally are not hyper-active with any unit any longer (where they are still registered Scouters, they may still, depending on the individual, come and attend Pinewood Derby, Klondike Derby, OA events, etc.) as "district-at-large" representatives. This job description is good resource: NCST-Unit-Commissioner-Job-Description.pdf (scouting.org)

There were many. Scouting in World War II Detention Camps (scoutingmagazine.org)

Outside group is not participating in "Scouting programs". so would see it as at discretion to that council.

Merit-Badge-Counselor-Qualifications.pdf (scoutspirit.org)

If worrying about there's alcohol and smoking, then our troop would cease to exist- we meet at an American Legion Post, where there is a bar open for members while we are meting in the room next door. Been that way for over 70 years. We're OK for meeting weekly under such conditions, but not to use a range once a year? I could absolutely see having a checklist and stipulations on what is required when using a sportsmens club versus a commercial range- namely, a fully certified instructor must be present. I've never experienced a sportsmens club that would be OK with a member drinking at the bar and then staggering their way out on to the range. Can't speak for anyone else, but at my club, we absolutely will talk with other members if we see them doing anything that is a safety violation, and we absolutely have politely made some folks former members for not following rules. Apply similar requirements for what we do with any facility that would fall under "short term camping" provisions now and the council can have an "approved" list of facilities- it isn't that difficult, and not that time consuming.

Also factor in impact to unit planning. If your council is different than ours, God bless. I can look at our council calendar today for August-December, and there are no dates for camporee listed. I can see OA weekend dates and NYLT weekend dates. Our unit is not unlike many around us, that planning meeting with PLC will take place before the end of July. If we don't have event dates to consider, then those events are not going to be considered. We will give deflection to not plan our weekend for one of the months there is an OA weekend for those who wish to attend that, but we aren't going to plan around both months.

👀 At least we are exceeding levels from during WWII

Our GT hasn't been over 5 at any point since we charted it in 2021. They elect an SPL rather than PL, and male SPL/female SPL share responsibilities they work out between them on opening/closing and planning. On outdoor weekends, they function as their own patrol so if only two attend, they divide all their responsibilities amongst the two (cooking, KP duty, etc.). I too have seen true co-ed units as well though. One unit near me, they had only a single SPL in 2022 for "the two units", and happened to be a girl that was elected. I used the co-ed Den example in another post of what these pilots amount to. Our pack had 2 females when that pilot was announced, not in the same age, but had one DL assigned that worked with them together (1 was Bear, the other AoL). Council flat out told the Cubmaster to opt into the pilot, as many other units were already doing it co-ed anyway. These pilots aren't to "discover something new", they are to affirm where others are already going rouge.

The undoing for me last year was the constant push on converting Candidate to Ordeal. The Lodge was in my view bordering on harassment for kids to attend Ordeal with emails every week. By the time you got to November, many parents would be unsubscribing from our email list, and when they changed LM to take that option out of mass emails, I'm sure many just started blocking our email. When Nat'l officially changed to allow 18 months to complete Ordeal, it was the last straw for me- to obvious it was about numbers which equal $$$ than it was about nor or quality in the achievement. for our Lodge, and many in the northern climes, elections took place in spring, and we'd have Ordeal weekends in May and either August & September or September & October. So, basically 3 opportunities after election. That 18 month change, the way it lays out on the calendar, was now 6 opportunities.