skeptic

Oh come on Brew'; that makes too much common sense. It is much better to complain and try and force them to change for you, rather than simply not associate with them. After all, it their right to make sure no widely recognized group can disagree or follow their own way without interference; even though they would complain if someone (actually have on occasion)suggests they should change their views. It really comes back to people being too full of themselves as I have noted numerous times. Back to preparing for camp and worrying about my own unit and its program. Do not have time to go beating the local council for possible under the radar atheists or Gays. Still think local option is the best answer and hope National eventually recognizes that as well.

If I remember correctly the union backed off pretty quickly, as they got very little sympathy or support, but lots of critcism. The very first project I encountered as SM was really different. He had noted broken and obscured street signs, or ones that turned around, as well as broken curbs and so on. He laid out a plot map with assigned sections for walkers or bike riders to survey, compiled it all into a master list, then put it on a master map. Lot of work that the city seemed thrilled to have. Of course, they barely followed up on most of the issues, which is sad. There was the project by a scout to update and make more ecumenical the military prayer book his grandfather had in WWII. It became a national distribution from what I understand, and included most religions and beliefs. But no matter if it turns into a major, national project of some sort, or simply fills a local need in a park or school, communities throughout the nation benefit with hundreds of thousands of free work by these scouts. I really do not think most critics of scouting have any idea how much practical good is done through scouting, both boy and girl. They are too wrapped up in their PC worries that mostly just show how insecure and ignorant they are. JMHO of course.

Another example of today's egocentricism.

Have been on and off RT staff and now have sort of had it dropped on me by the resignation of the leader. Have had fewer than a dozen, including staff and exec at the past few meetings. The only meetings at which we get a decent turnout are popcorn info night, which became the popcorn kickoff this past year, SFF setup and area coverage to avoid overlap if possible, and before recharter. Thinking we might be better off to go quarterly at a physical meeting and simply do on-line RT of some sort otherwise. Do like the idea of ALL units being part of the staff. We too have meeting overload issues, as well as distance for some. Hope that we soon get a volunteer for a new leader, as I really do not want the job, along with all my other hats.

Basement: Both of those could be very time consuming, depending on the prep work and size of the areas. A wheel chair ramp needs to theoretically meet certain minimal standards in most states, and would need to be dug out and have forms constructed if cement, then be leveled to the correct slant. It also might need a special surface treatment. Having not seen the extent of course, cannot judge what you speak about. As far as mulching goes, it again can become a very labor intensive project, especially if done with scouts using hand tools. But, yes there are occasional really weak projects; but they still meet the absolute minimum one would hope (assuming that the district/council advancement people properly review before and after).

Not sure what projects you saw, but in our district and council they average at least forty to fifty hours; some are well in excess of 100, while a few are extremely high and probably a bit over the top. Yes, a few likely come in around 20 or so, but not many. There is not actual amount, so it simply has to meet the intent and show leadership. Total hours also includes his own planning time.

Is this a violation? Cubs with a wagon!

Actually are pretty good, though you need to actually follow up with practice and individual work. They definitely give viewers a basic grasp of the requirements.

POSITION Im neither right nor left and certainly not center. To me to be among the silent majority means to be among the dead. And for me not two or ten or two hundred make up a minority. Every man is such because every man is different. If I met a man who looked like me and thought like me and walked and spoke like me and was in no way different from me only then would I consider slaying him for he would have stolen from me all those truths and all those lies I'd found out for myself. All the living that had brought me here that man would have erased by being just like me. But kill a man unlike myself ? Not likely. There might be something I could learn from him. There is so much I need to know, why there are no butterflies in the worlds backyard, and when I find it out I need to know how to get them back. Men trample beauty underfoot like it was gravel. These actions are confined to no one country but I resent it in my own because I love my country. Could it be that men join clubs as men carry them for security. But from what ? My security is my country and everything I am in life and everything I know and everything I care about revolves around it. And I live in America and I find its face not ugly except sometimes. -from The Power Bright & Shining, 1985

Actually Merlyn, the standing issue likely will eventually reach the high court with the San Diego case. The lower court's ruling on standing is thin at best, and completely illogical (logic is not always used in these decisions obviously) in that the primary litigants "never" actually tried to use the facilities because the very idea of even dealing with the BSA would somehow cause them emotional trauma. Reality is that they would not have been turned away in the first place if they had actually applied; though their first choices may have been taken by others, including scout units. I just wish this one would finally get to SCOTUS, as it just reeks of questionable rulings almost from the start, and is one of the best examples of the activist court. Yes, I know you disagree and think the public good is not a factor with the cases. If the scouts should lose the camps, the city and area will be the real losers. None of the government entities have the wherewithal to administer the "open to public" facilities or to maintain them, especially in this economy. So, Balboa, or at least the areas without buildings, would likely return to the natural state and become overgrown and another fire concern. And the Mission Park facility would likely be closed or become a private park with exorbitant costs. This just reflects the self centered positions of those bringing these suits. You will call it whining, or some other juvenile comment; I just call it logic and reality.

Just experienced this a few weeks back when a scout, after finishing OA Ordeal and just staying the night for morning ride, walked across the area near my cot, then sat down on a log. It unnerved me because he pretty much did not respond, other than saying yes when I asked him if he was okay. I was just preparing to change some clothes before getting in my bag, and I was under the stars with a cot. It was like he was simply sitting there staring at me. He finally got up and went back to his bag and went to sleep; the others in the area were all under the stars too. Next morning he had no memory of it. His mom says she has never seen him do it either. But, he had had a very long day and previous night; so that seems related. I had just laid back on my cot and sort of watched him until he went back to his bag. Then finished getting ready for the sack. Years ago had a scout actually get up inside a bag and sort of hop around in his sleep. I was ready to stop him, as he was headed in the direction of a drop off into the creek; but he laid back down and went back to sleep. Again, he did not remember; but his mom said he had been doing it off and on for a number of years. This was the first time he had slept outside a tent, so that may have had something to do with it.

Ah yes; "citizens bring lawsuits". In most of these cases you can find a political and/or extremist group pushing it from the background, at least to start. Of course, I am not sure what it says about an individual if they are "so threatened by an idea or belief" that they need to sue in the first place. If you do not believe in something, then tune it out and move on; or find some other group with which to interact. The real problem is the development of a radically egocentric society. As long as people feel that "only their feelings or beliefs" are important, there will be friction. People on both sides of disagreements need to get over themselves. As Rodney King said (RIP), "Why can't we all just get along?"

Made me smile; thanks. Was looking forward to an Uncle Dan type individual wearing a 1920's style uniform.(This message has been edited by skeptic)

Me thinks Tim242 may be a spammer????

Thanks; I will mention it to the assistant SE. Not sure where they are at on this, as almost anything new has to be brought to their attention by one of us before they make any effort to work with it or explain. They are understaffed, and under funded, like many, and so the ones there are over worked and always putting out fires.

We still do not have the complete freedom from extra permits locally in our council. I was told again today that we still have to file them as in the past, even if within the local council and less than 500 miles. So, we still have to print and take to the office, or fax. Wonder why the local council could not simply be added as a recipient of the on-line form. Then someone there could record it when they get it. But reality is that most plans/permits are not far enough out to be checked before an activity; so faxing or taking it in is still the best way for it to be on file there. It is a work in progress I guess. They did post something on "my scouting" regarding the flagging for first aid and cpr on other activities. Say it is NOT necessary, and ignore the flag.

Since I often tend to think that people might actually be rational and maybe even act with some amount common sense, I put these thoughts out there. First; when health care reform and adjustment has been a major issue for decades, and continues to be a problem, why has this even been the first actual legislation passed of any kind? Second; since there are parts of this act that actually are beneficial to most people, and especially those with kids in higher education or facing very expensive health problems, why is there the baying of destruction of the entire bill by those against it? Why not instead start working on finding ways to amend and adjust going forward. Even the President has made statements regarding a willingness to fine tune and rework it. Finally; why is it that almost none of the people in Congress, on either side, or the few independents, are willing to actually do their jobs? Leadership is about cooperation and putting the good of the group ahead of personal needs and gains. Or, at least that is what we in our unit attempt to get across to our scouts. It is fairly obvious to me that we have not had true representative government for a long time. If there was a way to actually make it happen, real election reform and spending controls would do wonders. But as long as pols control our National and State centers of government, we will continue to see little constructive work come out of them. How to get "THAT" to happen is another conundrum. Then, again, I tend to be rather skeptical that any of this is particularly likely. When less than 40% of the eligible voters even participate, and many of them are being led around by the ignorance of party politics and propagandists, there does not seem to be much hope. One can dream I suppose. I am disappointed in my own generation. We were so inspired for a short time to actually make a difference. But, we let ourselves be beat down and mostly just became self centered and short sighted. We let dreams be killed or subdued by the loss of some of our strongest inspirational leaders, rather than use their losses as catalysts to farther sighted action. Most disastrously, we have allowed money and power to almost completely invalidate the voice of the majority. But what do I know? I'm just a semi-retired teacher and scout leader.

So, can we claim mispronunciation when we hit our thumb with the hammer? Or do we just have a corner taken from our Hammer Swing'n Chit? Just asking.

It appears, at least with Chrome on my computer, that the tool bar type links at the top do not work, but the ones to right in the red boxes do. Once you get to the page, the sub categories do not work, but the main page items appear to.

Do have a question regarding the article stating they had the "first" female SPL. Not sure how that might happen, at least within normal bounds. If it is a crew, then the leader is a president. The crew would not be a part of the troop. I suppose they might have made a local decision to merge the two, so to speak, and have an overall group leader, or SPL. Back in the day, prior to coed of course, we had explorer patrols that operated separately from the main core of the troop, including being able to do both the explorer and scout advancement programs, but they were part of the troop just the same. We also have on file a charter for a "Sea Scout Patrol" within the troop back in the 30's or 40's. It appears to have been issued by National, but is a separate charter listing the patrol as part of the troop. Frankly, organizing along those lines might actually be a good way to re-position the program in some instances. I could see holding onto the older boys more easily if the coed function was available within the troop with the same age restrictions and leadership at least, or maybe even all ages. Of course, would need to also then make all ranks open to the girls too, which might also be a good thing.

Sort of like crowd control for the suffrage marches in the teens. The article notes the police refused to do it. Borderline, but a common thing back then in actuality.

Once again; we might want to consider the Koshare groups in Colorado. If you read their history, it is obvious that they have worked very hard over the years to develop authentic dances and to cooperate with traditions of the tribes from whom they take dances. And, if a concern is brought to them by a "legitimate" tribal authority, they have respected it, and worked to either solve the problem, or discontinue that part of their routines.

Great article; too bad no photos. But, there was also NO comments about the PC nonsense. That is to be lauded, as the story is about the unit.

The comments about OA being fake and insulting to Native American culture are simply part of the PC mentality of today. Yes, there have been some poor renditions of ceremonies and regalia; yes, some scouts involved do not give it the seriousness one would hope; yes, there have been a few real faux pas's over the years that did not show the OA as particularly cognizant of Native American history and tradition; but more often, the efforts are well done, and regularly receive positive feedback from local tribe representatives. In our area, we have local Chumash leaders that on occasion participate in ceremony. I continue to be a bit dismayed by the apparent overboard reactions by a few on these forums in response to various issues. It would concern me that they would possibly be that contentious and strident on local issues; not an example we might consider within the idea of "Scout Spirit". Just saying.

Engineer: "Some of us have no interest in the outdoors." If that is the case, then why would they even consider the BSA? Whether or not it is as extensive as it once was, which really depends on the unit program, outdoors is still a major part of the program. Someone joining with no interest in nature and the outdoors makes no sense at all.