In the last 25 years, I have seen the program be watered down for numerous reasons. National has to have a program they can sell to stay in existance. If the carrot is to be an eagle, then they gear the system to that.
I do believe that there are some individuals out there who will attempt to beat the system to have the boast of so many eagles produced under the leadership, but they are doing a severe disservice to those young men. These leaders are not following the oath "Do your Best". These adults are the ones that point to the numbers and equate them to a good program. Most are untrained.
If your Council has a strong training team, and the calaber of leadership within that team is of the highest standard, this problem should correct itself.
If you feel the problem is not being addressed, contact your Council Commissioner for a frank discussion. Each District should have an Advancement Chairperson that arranges for an Eagle Board of Review. If the standards are not being met, then maybe it can be addressed through these channels.
Remember, we only work here, the rules are set by the National Program Directors. If enough concern is voiced to National, they will listen, as money talks, membership is $$$$$. Their reason for employment is based on how many and how much.