To answer your questions Buffalo2, and as long as you bear with me because I am relying on my memories of the event that happened almost a year ago, I won't worry about you putting me on spot.
Our training was run by the adult crew advisors from the council. There were a number of crews involved. Each advisor went over a different section of the training. The training as a whole was not a failure. I think that the fact that the training was implimented and it was well attended is proof that it was a success, as you all probably know, it's difficult for those two elements to happen in Venturing Crews all the time.
On the actual training events, I found that the segement we had on goal making and mission statement discussions was really interesting, because each individual thought about their own goals and mission statement, but then the topic was broadened to how it applies to the crews.
Another topic that worked really well was a section on non-verbal communication and listening skills, where crew members broke into pairs, and each person had a trait of poor listening skills (like interrupting, looking around, talking to other people, getting up and pacing) taped to their forehead, without them knowing what it is...their partner was supposed to act what was on the card. It was an activity to show how frustrating it is when someone is not listening. It was fun and I think another reason it worked so well was we saw the imediate application of the task at hand.
I enjoyed using the "Gettysburg" segments, but I dont know how well it went over with the other crew members.
I feel that activities like the human knot, which was used at our training, was really not age appropriate and what crew member has never done the human knot?
Those are the things that really stood out in my memory about my training. I would really like to hear what other people have to think on how we can better this program. If I understand correctly, there's a lot of wiggle for us all to adapt the trainings and better the program.