Wow, this is complicated!
The troop eagle adviser also happens to be the DAC. We are just blessed he works with our troop as eagle adviser as well. The supposed benefit to this is that once he approves it, it is guaranteed to be approved all the way up.
The signature issue is confusing for me but he had the signatures done in the order they were listed in the packet. He first got the one from the benefiting organization, after all, if they did not want the project done, the rest would be pointless. Then he got the unit committee member and an assistant scout master, since his dad is scout master. Then he submitted it to the Eagle Adviser/DAC. No official work has been done on the project but one of the EA/DAC's first comments was that he needed to list who was willing to commit to help with the project, so he contacted cub scout packs, a brownie troop, and the four martial arts schools he teaches at to get them to commit to help. All of these groups are about to back out of helping because he asked them two months ago and they wanted to do this by their meeting before Christmas at the latest.
The EA/DAC sometimes has just tossed it back and said, "More details", then after more details were added, "Not good enough". Every once in a while it is more specific as in the case of the above or when told to make a section on exactly what leadership qualities are being displayed in each step of the project.
His father is the scoutmaster, which causes more problems than it solves. If he were just a dad, he could advocate for his son. As the SM, advocating for his son is interpreted by some as undue pressure or abuse of power, which was a major issue in this troop before we joined. Not really sure what happened but had something to do with 13 year old Eagles.
My son has been pushing his own project and dealing with it on his own. Y'all are the first people I have addressed this to, and he is unaware I am doing this. I am just looking for a direction to point him. He has met with the EA/DAC on four occasions and has e-mailed the various versions of his packet with changes to him sometimes twice a week trying to nail down this down.
He has a checklist for Eagle Scout Project Approval, a sample of what the planning details should include, as well as the actual guidelines provided in the workbook and he has met all of these requirements.
The EA/DAC did meet with him before he even submitted this idea on a previous project idea. He had about 30 hours into the planning of the project, meeting with a park ranger to work on it, when he first met this man. He looked at the proposal and said it would never be approved. (We later found out that two scouts from another district are indeed doing the same project.) So, he spent about half an hour discussing other possible projects and what was doable and what was not. When this idea came up, he said it was doable and so my son moved forward on it, not doing the project but planning and writing it up. So, I am assuming it is not the concept but the proposal that is the issue and since he has followed all the guidelines, I was hoping to find somewhere I could direct him to find further explanations so he could get something written up that would satisfy this man. As I read the few Eagle projects I could actually find written up on the web, as well as those I have hands on access to, I found that my son's is more detailed than the vast majority, so there must be something else wrong with it but he is not getting very specific critiques and does not know what to do at this point.
I have to be honest, at first it seemed pretty well written and straight-forward to me. As he has continued to add more detail and description, not only has it become ridiculously long, but it is getting confusing to follow, and there is a great deal of repetition. Again, as an example, on the safety issues, he addresses the exact same issues in three different places because he explains them at each stage as they relate, then summarizes at the end of the planning stage, then he was told to have a whole section just discussing safety. There are no power tools, no electricity, no transportation provided, no food provided, and he has two safety trained leaders willing to be on site at the final stage of the project.