I have read many threads on boy-led troops and who's in charge. Knowing how things are supposed to be, I'm not sure we can ever get there. We are rural, drawing from schools that are sports rivals. We have one patrol. We have invisible boys, who usually end up not coming back at all, and invisible leaders. We have no committee meetings (I'm on the committee). I think we have a unique situation.
Because of his job, the SM comes to every other meeting, which he runs, on a day of the week that he chose due to other commitments, knowing one boy had a long-term conflict. The SM joined the troop in its second year when he was 16 and has been with it ever since in some capacity. The unit commissioner usually comes the other weeks. I was planning to turn in charter renewal papers for the troop when I turn in the pack papers and the SM said he would handle it. I really think he wants no input from me when it comes to running the troop. I have mentioned that all of us leaders should get refresher training. The SM said flatly that he was trained years ago. I have no reason to not trust the SM. The SM's wife is the COR and the SM has put her name down as the TCC. Our brand new DE is trying to get his own act together.
I have put in many hours over five years trying to keep the troop and pack alive, including running a couple of troop meetings because the SM and other leaders couldn't make it, or running the pack meetings because leaders left. Having a Boy Scout, a Cub, and another Cub next year, I would like to see the troop and pack thrive. I have seen "trouble-makers" driven away and good people abandon us. The leaders we have think no one at a higher level cares about us. I believe that without the SM we will totally fall apart.
So, I guess my question is how can I be a "trouble-maker" and not get driven away? How can I tell the Boy Scouts that I am disappointed that they didn't do this or that without casting shadows in the direction of the SM? It's obvious who is in charge of our troop; how can we turn it around?