MattR

Really. Given the amount of feedback accepted from volunteers this is almost laughable. And yet, it would be nice if the organization existed to make use of it. Every 18 yo scout I talked to had very similar feedback for me and I've represented their opinions here to the best of my abilities. Less book work, more doing, etc.

I have to admit this is one rule I'd modify. I can't see how letting an 18 yo scout stay with his friends is a problem. Without friendships scouting is a bust. Lack of friendships is the main reason scouts leave. Its why I left.

First of all, it's good that you did hold everyone back. But when will the criminal SOL rules change? We've talked so much about civil SOL laws but not much about criminal. I would have thought those would change first but I don't know much about any of this.

Deciding "fair" sounds like deciding art, it depends on who you are and what your circumstances are. What would be fairer to everyone would be if the BSA had not been withering on the vine for the past 60 years. Without that there would be more money and more donations. If 20% of all available kids were in scouts then whether or not the BSA fails would not be an issue. So I'm not sure "greed" of those seeking money really has much to do with any bad news. Sure, the bankruptcy may be speeding any demise up, but I have no illusions as to the BSA's plan of increasing membership in a few years. It reminds me of the Soviet's five year plans. Goals are easily written. What has made scouting good are the volunteers. The money saved in coffers has less to do with the quality of the program. Sure, summer camps can be nicer with a lot of donations but it's the day to day people that make the program work and those are volunteers. Anyway, while I have fond memories of what scouting has done for many scouts, I just can't see how the bankruptcy is really going to make a big difference in the long run. Camps are just being sold earlier, that's all.

My guess is that they assume the parent is more reliable at keeping up the membership? I asked my son if he wanted any of the email I get for him and he said no. He's busy and I can't blame him.

In order to mitigate pine beetle and fire hazards our camp and state and county parks have felled lots of trees. Maybe the forestry MB mentions this. BTW, those hooks to move logs I've seen. They work much better than a long prybar. I will leave prybars for rocks, tiles and 2x4s.

What's a prybar used for in the woods - assuming no nails are involved?

Good story. We had an awesome competition and everyone said speed and I said precision. So it was how many times can you split a log, and you had to use the smaller piece of any split for the next try. That was fun. Except for when, using an axe, they use a wrong stance and nearly hit their foot. That can prevent them from ever walking again. Table saws are a whole different class of how to hurt yourself. It's one reason why I prefer hand tools in my wood shop. While I have a table saw I would like to get good enough and have nice enough hand saws to replace it. Hand tools are slow but they're much more enjoyable. It's the difference between walking in the woods and driving at rush hour.

Another question: why doesn't the doj declare the plan illegal now?

Nice patrol method!

I completely agree with you how complex this is. I would have thought the BSA's lawyers knew that as well and might have told them the quickest and cheapest way out of this would be an honest discussion with the TCC. I mean, if the biggest chunk of legal fees is from the BSA's lawyers and they have nothing to show after 2 years and 40% of the BSAs total value being wasted .... The coalition and TCC aren't driving this, yet.

But in most cases, other than this one, the legal fees are small potatoes compared to the value of the company. The example in the article was that for Enron it was 2% and for the BSA it's already 40%. 2% wouldn't have much impact on what survivors get. I'd like to see that 40% split out by the various groups of lawyers. I have a hunch the BSA was sold a bill of goods by its own lawyers. Their plan has been to drag this out while trying shady deals with whomever told them what they wanted to hear. That doesn't seem to be working very well for anyone but the lawyers.

There absolutely was a problem with adults not following well thought out rules. However, there was still a failure and a scout was badly hurt. So maybe there isn't a need to add more adults but there is a need to have more adults follow the existing rules. The current model of watching an hour long video isn't working and it never has. I started a thread about improving quality at the unit level because of this exact scenario. Adults at one unit get lax and all of a sudden every unit suffers, as well as a child. It's in everyone's interest to make sure everyone follows these rules. I have no idea how to make that happen in the BSA as it currently exists.

Welcome to the forum, @ToKindle96 I agree that dual troops are essentially coed. I have not seen any of the boys be idiots but it doesn't surprise me. If I were still SM and I did see it we would have a discussion. I have also not seen the girls take over. They like their patrol. They also like a bigger troop with a bunch of patrols. It's doing more to promote patrol method than anything else.

Welcome to the forum, @Scouting412 I'm not sure boy led is a binary thing. Some scouts need more help as they learn. Where are they not leading?? Do they know what could be fun and are just not motivated or are they just out of ideas? Are they overwhelmed with how much needs to get done? Do they have a process to come up with a good calendar/plan and are stuck at some point or are they just flailing? Are they just afraid of failure? My point is keep it boy led but figure a way to help them improve. That's your job description. I think you're going in the right direction.

Thank you for the laugh. There are many such bits of threads. There could be a sub forum. Anyway, I will give you my thesis. I'm doing this on my phone so be patient. The common complaint is that BSA seems to have forgotten what scouts really enjoy about scouting. Call it the core program. Or better yet, The Game. There are certainly other challenges like teaching adults, well, everything (outdoor skills, working with youth). Where this comes from, from my perspective, is what we call silos and also really poor hiring and advancement practices. Look at the top levels of leadership and the silos are writ large. So is the board. The NEB is huge and has broken itself into lots of committees. The NEC is mostly a group of committee heads. It's not clear to me whether any committee is primarily responsible for The Game. So The Game has been ignored for a very, very long time. Even if there is a committee to protect the game from other committees, that would only mean one person on the NEC. The BSA itself also looks like these committees. So, my thesis is that to fix the BSA the NEC needs to be replaced by the right people. All of the ideas of how to make scouting better will lead from that. Fixing advancement, summer camps, adult training, safety and all the rest will come from getting the right people in place that understand scouting. That starts with a real board. The problem is the current members won't step down and the upper echelon of the BSA probably either doesn't have the power or knowledge on how to do that. It would likely take a true leader to convince the entire NEB to step down. Instead, we have a scape goat that was installed to take the fall (and is likely not legally liable for anything since he was a volunteer).

First of all, I moved this sub thread to the appropriate thread. Second, to answer your question, I'm not sure our opinions matter at this point. What will happen will happen. As an aside, I'm almost done reading War and Peace, which takes place in Russia during Napolean's invasions, and a common theme is large organizations have a mind of their own irrespective of what most leaders wish. So, as I watch the BSA, my guess is that while everyone will blame the bankruptcy and covid on whatever bad luck happens, it most likely stems from events and decisions made many decades ago. Case in point, back in the 40s and 50s there was Hillcourt and an organization that ran the BSA. They weren't on the same page. They never were. But Hillcourt was a force in that he wrote all the manuals that everyone used. It didn't matter what the rest of the organization did; Bad hiring; Inbred; Focused on fundraising. That organization created a monster of bad leadership that was kept at bay by Hillcourt's persona. But then he retired and the monster took over. While Hillcourt was good at writing and connecting to scouts, he couldn't change national. Furthermore, the 60s, millennial, and all the other cultural excuses people like to blame also didn't change much. And the bankruptcy and covid aren't going to change much of anything either. A new Hillcourt could turn things around but the BSA can't let that happen. This is an organization that has a mind of its own. Irrespective of what any one wants, the organization will keep bringing in the likes of Mosby. Sorry for sounding grim.

I moved a sub thread that had little to do with the actaual court case to

Yes, but can you show the scouts how to gut a yak and sleep inside the carcass for an emergency shelter? Face it, that would make scouts cool.

Unless you have a solid bar for the "ropes" of the swing it's impossible to do a loop on a swingset. But, I suppose not many students took physics back in your day, either.

Not a good look if they can't even get the titles correct.

On the one hand I could see survivors struggling to fill out the form. If a form needed dates for when I was a scout I could not do much better than a year or two. Someone suffering trauma might just freeze up at that point. On the other hand, the lawyer that signed that form could and should have walked them through it. The fact that any of these forms do not have at least a range of dates or locations is on the lawyers. As for the records, here's a simple test. Take a random sample of 1000 scouters that were scouts and see what percentage of youth records can be found. If it's only 5% then that explains the discrepancy. If it's 75% then there's a big problem. I'm all for truth and knowledge, for the sake of everyone involved.

There's a 70 year troop in our town that just lost its charter from a methodist church. They're asking if they can meet at our church on another night. I asked if our CO knows what they're getting into. The good news is they're taking their CO responsibility seriously.

A more accurate understanding helps everyone. I'm not sure why it's taken so long to get to the point where this is being looked at but I'm glad it is.

No, it was addressed. I said you can have her removed from the pack. I had a bully in my troop and I had him removed. I told him he was no longer welcome and if he showed up I would call the police. He left our troop, joined another and the exact same thing happened there. The council eventually set his son up as a lone scouter. I think your challenge is that you don't know how or don't want to confront a bully. It is not easy and it takes all the fun out of scouting. I can't blame you for not wanting to deal with it. Unfortunately, nobody else is interested in leading that so it typically would be up to the unit leader, i.e., you, to make it happen. Being the kind and loving cubmaster you are, it's likely not in your DNA to tell someone "leave or I will call the police." That's not very cubscout like. It really is getting in someone's face, drawing a line, and having the conviction to follow through. The fact that you asked for help and didn't get any just illustrates how leadership can be lonely at times. Take care and enjoy camping.