Thank you all for your sound advice. I too think building leadership skills are essential to success for every young man (thats why we all love Scouting). I wanted to pose this question as a neutral party at first. My son had been met with this request; he has logged 25 to 30 service hours as Star, and was acting SPL. Twenty two of his hours were with a team of missionaries in Mexico serving the poor. He could not lead other Scouts there; he did comply with the CC and SMs request concerning this issue which will postpone his advancement several weeks are more. We thought it best for him as a leader to comply first then take up the issue with those parents both for and against (no whining). I would like our troop to continue striving for these skills but implement them within the stated guidelines. Not reading something into them for justification, a troop could weaken requirements using that logic. The boys, not to mention in this "Boy Led" organization were never brought into the discussion.
Our troop has a substantial number of active parents. The Scouts, SM, ASM's, and CC are incredible we have a high percentage of Eagle's and new Eagle candidates all of which happened before this recently added requirement, but due to the forward thinking and striving for excellence which motivated it.
This will be one of the topics in our next committee meeting and it is so helpful to get third party opinions from this forum. Again thank you all, whether for or against your insight and wisdom is invaluable.
Longhaul although I still dont agree youve shed greater light on the thought process behind the decision.
God Bless you all,
Gilski
Troop Chaplin