evmori

The problem with sending any non parent or legal guardian on any type of outing where they share a tent with a scout, it is against YPGs. No it's not! If the person accompanying the Scout is the Scouts legal guardian, there is no YP violation!

Been there. Done that. Time to apologize. End of story. When I was a SM, if a Scout lost his Tot-n-Chit, he had to re-earn it.

Can I get some ice cream with that 3.14159265358979323846? If the BSA would change the way they charter units, the public school & government agency thing would be a moot point.

The only reason abortion isn't murder is because it is a medical procedure.

You used the analogy of hitting someone with your car, Merlyn, which had absolutely nothing to do with anything! I was just pointing out how inane that comparison was. And also how it's isn't always illegal!

Not legally, Beavah. I can hit someone with my car, but that wouldn't make it legal, either. Hitting someone with your car is only illegal if your intent was to do them harm, otherwise it is probably an accident & that is not illegal. Try aagin!

Beavah, "clarify" means explaining a statement *I HAVE MADE* Now aren't you doing EXACTLY what you accused Beavah of? No, you idiot. Now how is that debating? That is blatant name calling & the last resort of a desperate man! How is it lying when the statement made by someone about you is based on your prior posts? Did you actually say that? No. Did Beavah post that you did say that? No.

Ps here's a link for 4 Kings 2:23-24 What version of the Bible is this?

Ed, I can't debate the topic if someone feels free to make up what I would say and falsely ascribe that to me. Actually, Merlyn, what was posted was based on your past behavior and accurate.

The clerk who tried to deny my voter registration because I refused to answer her question about my beliefs was eventually told, by her supervisor, to register me anyway. Was that wrong? No it wasn't. The clerk was in the wrong. No Merlyn, it is still name calling. In a civil debate, the debaters debate the topic, not the individual.

Yep this thread has no point. It should be terminated.

Water & dirt!

Once the liar card is played nothing else matters! Name calling is not debating! It is a direct attack on a poster! Which usually means the name caller is out of arguments!

1st there is no 4 Kings 2:23-24. 2nd, lots of horrible things happened in ancient times. And let's not forget, Christians didn't exist until after Christ was crucified. Most of the people referred to in the OT were Jews. 3rd, what's your point?

I'd borrow a uniform if that's possible but would not buy one. By requiring the Scout be in uniform is adding to the requirements.

Were the people on the board in uniform?

There we go! The liar card has been played! Atheists have the same rights as all American citizens! Your rights are not being trampled on, Merlyn! Neither is any other atheist!

Excellent! Congrats! Appeal time pack! As OGE posted, uniforms ain't required!

Ed, what's offensive is your thick-headedness in thinking being offended is the posited constitutional problem. It isn't. I never said it was, Merlyn. That's my point! Atheists have the same rights as non-atheists, yet you moan & complain your rights are being violated!

No one has said atheists have less rights than others! They have the same rights as every other American citizen. What you are advocating, Merlyn, is special rights for atheists! The Constitution guarantees a lot but it doesn't guarantee you won't be offended.

Better idea! Do away with the idea of unit numbers!

Ah! You need to wear your iPod on an armband when you don your Speedo!(This message has been edited by evmori)

Maybe they should just scrap the unit number patches & just sell everyone a red Sharpie & they can write their unit number on their uniform!

Scratch & sniff!! (picking myself off the floor & pulling up my Speedo!) That's funny~

Speedos & scats! WOW! Is that the founder I hear rolling over?