Leaderboard

I'm going with an attempt at quality control. I wonder how many people bombed the survey and had their SYT revoked?

Just got this "survey" request through email. But, it is not a survey... it is a test of your knowledge and application of Safeguarding Youth policies and procedures. Incorrect to call it a survey... a survey asks for your opinion or perspective on things. This was just a 22-question outright multiple choice exam. Ignorant? Manipulative? Misleading? Deceptive? I'll apply Hanlon's Razor and move on... https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hanlons-razor NOTE: Link removed as it may be user-unique... Dear Scouting America Member, At Scouting America, safeguarding our youth isn’t just a priority—it’s central to preparing young people for life. Your perspective and input helps strengthen the safe, supportive environment that families expect from our programs. As part of our continuing effort to strengthen our safeguarding efforts, Scouting America is working with USA Child, a nonprofit think tank devoted to ending child abuse and neglect, on evidence-based solutions to issues related to safeguarding youth. Your input in this process is critical. Please take a few minutes to complete USA Child Research’s brief, anonymous child‑safety survey. Deadline to complete the survey is December 31, 2025. Click here to start the survey: Thank you for taking the survey and for all you do to keep kids safe. Glen Pounder Chief Safeguarding Officer Scouting America

Another pet peeve... Scout camps that are not designed around the Patrol Method. What we have mostly these days is a Troop-amoeba campsite with individual Scouts doing their own individually tailored programs during the day. And, they are being given merit badges without having done the work. (Yes, there are exceptions, but this is the general rule, in my observation...) The hidden message is that advancement is the primary purpose of Scouting. If the flagships of the councils, the council-run Summer Camps, are not pushing the Patrol Method, then they work at cross-purposes with units who are trying to do it that way.

We are not making participation mandatory for Scouts or parents. In Scouting, there really isn't "skin in the game" unless you want to put it there. Yes, this is it. When I had the reins of the Troop, we went camping every month, with two or three big events every summer... 50-miler backpacking trips, week-long beach adventures, 50-miler canoeing, 100+ mile cycling trips, etc. Now that I have pulled back a lot from the Troop, there is no one who is willing to put that much effort into the program. So, the numbers are dwindling. Agree with you wholeheartedly... young men want adventure, not academics.

Your idea isn't new; the BSA has made these kinds of promises since the creation of the program. I do agree that at this age, cost isn't as much of an issue as the cub program, but a results-based program is very subjective. And most of the time the adults go the easy route of Eagle for their results-based program. However, youth at this age aren't advancement-driven. I found that most Eagle-driven programs lose 70% of their scouts by age 15 because advancement gets boring. Adventure-driven programs thrive because they are fun in the outdoors, and because independence in the patrol method drives more maturity in their growth. Go look at units where scouts age out, and you will find they are more scout-run with adventure. Also, adventure-driven programs typically have a high number of Eagles because the scouts are in the program a long time and earn the Eagle requirements by simply participating. Barry

Putting on my Membership Chairman hat. Almost 95% of scouts in troops come from the Cubs. If the youth aren't recruited in Cubs, the troops will have to recruit from other sources. When National added additional requirements to the Tiger program in 2000 (increasing meetings to every week, an adult required for each scout), many units were unable to meet the new demands, and the Tiger numbers dropped significantly. That drop became obvious in 2005 when the troop membership suddenly dropped. If you don't get the Cubs, you don't get the crossovers. Barry

Members without a unit are people who were on rosters when a unit failed to recharter or had their charter taken. They are also people who are members-at-large of a district or council. What happens to your people will depend on what they want to do. I do know that in most councils that members without report is a free-for-all for the various member coordinators to call and solicit for transfer.

There is a report that I can access in my.scouting called "members without a unit" that shows me all Scouts and Scouters who may be in that situation. Either the unit is folding or may be late in turning in their recharter paperwork. I am able to select someone from that list and transfer them to another unit.

Scouting's success is inversely proportional to how much scouting is like school.