Council Relations
Discuss issues relating to Scout Councils, districts and working with professionals
676 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 804 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 15 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 701 views
-
- 22 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 60 replies
- 7.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 15 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 50 replies
- 6.3k views
-
- 38 replies
- 4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.2k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
IMO the workbook is awful in so many ways. Filling it out almost becomes the project itself. Adding another layer to it makes it even worse. -
Yet another discussion that is proof that we should scrap the eagle project. -
No more and no less, use the tools and requirements Sadly there are units that feel the need to put "their" spin on projects. Must have CAD drawings, Must build something, Must put in XX hours, Must have XX Scouts work on the project, Must, Must, Must. While the intentions may be good, as has been noted, these local add-ons do not adhere to G2A. How to politely navigate that deviation can be a challenge -
By RememberSchiff · Posted
Then again, suppose the Scout's Eagle Mentor stood up and grabbed a Commissioner to jointly educate the Troop Committee? My $0.02, -
This is a good point. It is treated like a mini day of summer camp.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)