Advancement Resources
Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs
2434 topics in this forum
-
- 9 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 23 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 860 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 35 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 923 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 24 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 48 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 710 views
-
- 7 replies
- 963 views
-
- 3 replies
- 784 views
-
- 2 replies
- 766 views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By RememberSchiff · Posted
Moderator note: We scouts can agree to disagree without being disagreeable. Thank you! ~ RS @Eagle1993 -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
Other than "lawyer" and "Scout", what names did I call you, pray tell? Upon further reexamination, I retract both. -
By SiouxRanger · Posted
My analysis is based on the facts presented. The parent's intent is pretty clear: Dupe their employer into making a MATCHING charitable donation, all the while the parent intending to effectively retract their donation. Why, oh WHY would the parent not just pay for their scout's expenses straight-away without involving their employer??? To obtain $$$ from their employer AT NO EXPENSE to the parent. They never made a donation for their employer to match. My analysis is always subject to reexamination if further facts are presented. Stick to legal analysis and skip the name-calling. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
Well, your legal analysis is shoddy. You have assumed the parents' intent without any knowledge other than the OP. And cast several other aspersions on them without any verifiable facts. As a lawyer, you should know better. As a Scout, you should be ashamed. -
By SiouxRanger · Posted
I practice law for a living. Over 45 years now. Legal analysis is not a beauty contest. I stand by my analysis.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)