Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.


Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    815
    posts
  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2.8k
    posts

9669 topics in this forum

  1. Good Grief!

    • 7 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.1k views
  2. Troop Meeting Agenda

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  3. Your favorite tent 1 2

    • 18 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 9 replies
    • 5.6k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.1k views
  4. signaling record

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 26 replies
    • 3.1k views
  5. Camping Nights Per Year

    • 8 replies
    • 3.6k views
  6. Need some Catapult plans

    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.1k views
  7. Eagle sequence

    • 3 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 68 replies
    • 7.8k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • I had read that if the Third Circuit tosses the Trust, most of us get nothing.  I can't find any detail online regarding Kosnoff's plan if it is rejected.  Can you elaborate?
    • Everybody should be rooting for the 3rd Circuit to reject the BSA’s equitable mootness argument. With that done, the plan is effectively finished because of Sackler ruling rejecting non-consensual third party releases. Century Chubb and the other settling insurers will pull their contributions to the ST which will be kaput. So then…it will get interesting. Kosnoff has been floating some possibilities all of which are much better than this POS the TCC and the all corrupt law firms foisted on the survivors. 
    • I also voted no.  As soon as I learned that my claim would be mostly wiped out by the Matrix SoL, there was no point in supporting it.  Then, to make matters worse, although I submitted a lot of case law the administrator reduced the claim as much as possible.  The matrix had made the state where my abuse occurred a 10-25% factor.  You guessed it...she used the 10 and wouldn't begin to adjust it in "reconsideration".  The whole thing is a sham.
    • Tim Kosnoff is an attorney and he called it a b.s. settlement (he actually called it “sellout” not a settlement. Fools believed the unbelievable. A “substantial” majority of survivors voted to approve it.    If you voted for it, look in the mirror for who to blame. Of course, those lawyers were lying. But it was all there in black and white. What a fool believes—he sees. 
×
×
  • Create New...