Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.


Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    815
    posts
  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2.8k
    posts

9654 topics in this forum

    • 5 replies
    • 1.7k views
  1. Annoying Popup

    • 5 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.5k views
  2. The patrol method 1 2

    • 21 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 12 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 40 replies
    • 4.3k views
  3. A visiting scout !

    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 995 views
    • 4 replies
    • 935 views
    • 9 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 8 replies
    • 3.6k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • This is what the Commissioner Corps is supposed to be for.  And, in all the councils I have been in, it has been sorely lacking.  I have some thoughts on the reasons for this.  What are yours, and how could we fix?
    • Agreed.  Quality control is a major issue.  ... Scouting is like ordering a McDonalds Quarter Pounder and having equal odds of getting chicken nuggets, a taco or dog food.   Units have such different personalities and habits.  Leaders are even more varied.  When the scouting magic is there, it's a wonderful experience.  It's easy to miss out on that magic though.
    • Maybe, most the strongest units in my area have some sort of relationship with a church that provides large amounts of space for storage and program use. There is definitely something that strengthens units when they say "We meet every week on Wednesday night at 7PM unless it's a major holiday like Christmas".
    • I am starting to believe that the #1 problem is quality control. So many bad units run by bad leaders. How many kids join, have a horrible experience, quit, and never come back? 
    • This latest round of information and argument seems to forget that there are a significant number of CO and councils that no longer exist. These cases are not like a chemical company buying a going out of business other chemical company and acquiring the toxic assets with the positive assets in the purchase.  The argument of being able to sue councils and CO's can also be made that other entities are not liable for those specific cases, additionally that argument could also be made by councils and CO's that they are not liable and the victims should be forced to sue the direct perpetrators.  If this bankruptcy and settlement gets revoked the vast majority of survivors will end up with nothing. The survivors that get something will get a paltry part compared to what their individual lawyers suck out of the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...