Open Discussion - Program
Share Scouting Topics here.
Subforums
-
- 815
- posts
-
- 2.8k
- posts
9669 topics in this forum
-
- 20 replies
- 4k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 26 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 631 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.6k views
-
- 29 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 865 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.5k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By johnsch322 · Posted
I for one voted no both times. -
Tim Kosnoff is an attorney and he called it a b.s. settlement (he actually called it “sellout” not a settlement. Fools believed the unbelievable. A “substantial” majority of survivors voted to approve it. If you voted for it, look in the mirror for who to blame. Of course, those lawyers were lying. But it was all there in black and white. What a fool believes—he sees. -
-
It is too early to tell, but in our council, there is indication that we are slowly seeing the trench workers taking charge. Out pro, is not one really, though a nice person with I think good intentions. But, putting things out publicly and following up are very slow or not happening. Our council website is an embarrassment in that it has mostly dead links and so does little to help if someone goes to it. The notice of the final sale of our now lost camp has still not been noted, and so some of those dead links relate to it. Somehow, we are continuing, and historically it is again on the backs of the volunteers, though reality is that community support is still there if Council pays attention and makes the effort. But just begging for money is not what is needed. JMHO of course,
-
Manpower is down everywhere. The only solution is to start recruiting from cubs on up to district. Hard, and take time.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)