Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.

Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    815
    posts

  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2.8k
    posts

9654 topics in this forum

  1. Sad News 1 2

    By dave.424,
    • 18 replies
    • 3.7k views

  2. 100th Annivesary Logo 1 2

    By stevejb,
    • 18 replies
    • 2.4k views

  3. 2 deep leadership question...

    By pixiewife,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views

  4. Approved shooting range.... question?

    By Pack378,
    • 9 replies
    • 1.5k views

  5. Church on Sunday when camping? 1 2 3

    By Beavah,
    • 35 replies
    • 5.5k views

  6. NYLT for a 13 year old

    By kahits,
    • 8 replies
    • 1.7k views

  7. Answers from Irving

    By Beavah,
    • 12 replies
    • 1.6k views

  8. Happy Birthday to You, Lord Baden-Powell

    By OldGreyEagle,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.5k views

  9. "wide game" for spring encampment

    By AnneinMpls,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views

  10. safe scouting/transportation question

    By jhubb,
    • 5 replies
    • 1.6k views

  11. Spring camporee ideas please

    By lisa365,
    • 9 replies
    • 1.9k views

  12. Scouts on NASCAR Angels TV Show

    By Scouter&mom,
    • 2 replies
    • 1.5k views

  13. Rules and judgement

    By Oak Tree,
    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views

  14. Uniform Not Required 1 2 3 4 5

    By OldGreyEagle,
    • 64 replies
    • 8.1k views

  15. Recruiting from the Hispanic Population

    By hotdesk,
    • 8 replies
    • 2k views

  • LATEST POSTS

    • Eagledad
      quality, commissioners, and more, oh my

      By Eagledad · Posted

      Yes, my delegating comment was for the program 25 or 30 years ago when there were still many experienced Scouters. My point about the adults in today's scouts program is a different situation. I'm pretty creative when looking for solutions, but this one is a challenge. The program now, whatever it's called (part of the problem), needs big changes in identity and training. Barry
    • InquisitiveScouter
      quality, commissioners, and more, oh my

      By InquisitiveScouter · Posted

      As you point out, many now have no outdoors/Scouting experience... so to whom are they to delegate?
    • InquisitiveScouter
      Can "Friends of [local Scouting]" (i.e., new CO after split from church CO) solicit funds for the CO, which then get donated to units?

      By InquisitiveScouter · Posted

      Yeah, we could do a wiki and generate most of the materials coming out of National.  Including the Scout Handbook.
    • DuctTape
      Can "Friends of [local Scouting]" (i.e., new CO after split from church CO) solicit funds for the CO, which then get donated to units?

      By DuctTape · Posted

      And this is where the problem begins. National has zero interest or motivation for scouting to be a quality program. By design councils (and units) exist for the benefit of HQ. By extension units exist to benefit councils. The system needs to be flipped. National HQ primary responsibility should be to support councils, and Councils primary responsibility should be to support units. National should be using big$ donations to fund the basics of the councils. Councils should not be begging scouters and parents via FOS. Camporees should not be used as a means to generate revenue b/c HQ refuses to fund their own system. At present, IMO, National HQ serves no purpose to scouts, units or councils.
    • Eagledad
      quality, commissioners, and more, oh my

      By Eagledad · Posted

      If the unit commissioner isn't working, it's the DE's fault. I have seen districts with great Commission Corp, and it's a beautiful thing to watch. However, the DC's job is complicated and requires above-average skills and training. Most districts don't recruit people capable of developing and using those skills. Yep. In the earlier days, before 1990, 80% of unit leaders were scouts as a youth. So, they walked knowing more about the game than the purpose. They basically stepped into the position running, and the implementation wasn't overly complex. Today's unit is lucky to have 25% leaders with a youth scouting experience. Training just doesn't meet the need for new adult leaders without a youth scouting experience.  It's not so simple. Learning the skills on your list, much less knowing when to use them, takes a long time. One-year first-class scouts are typically terrible with skills. Mostly because a program that encourages earning First Class in one year isn't a good skills program anyway. I've trained and counseled a lot of scoutmasters without a youth scouting experience, and most quit in a couple of years, realizing they were not right for the job. However, I believe they would have been fine if they had been willing to delegate skills they lacked to others. I had the skills but rarely needed them because I was a delegator and liked to get other people involved. And, there are very few skills adults need to know that older scouts can't do themselves. But, in almost every case of the scoutmasters I counseled, the scoutmaster took on the responsibility because they wanted to be head honcho, and the responsibilities didn't look hard. Their ego was the problem.  The program has a big challenge today because most of the leaders they get today don't have an understanding of the program from youth experience, so they see it from a different perspective. Typically, it is not a perspective that is fun for the youth. Also, the program has changed in the last few years, so its newer identity is not attractive to the last generation of scouts. My 37- and 40-year-old sons aren't interested in being leaders because what they see doesn't appear like the program they had in the late 90s.  Barry
×
×
  • Create New...