Open Discussion - Program
Share Scouting Topics here.
Subforums
-
- 815
- posts
-
- 2.8k
- posts
9671 topics in this forum
-
- 14 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 24 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 931 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 23 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 26 replies
- 7.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
- 23 replies
- 4k views
-
- 32 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 15 replies
- 2k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.4k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
I don’t think merging councils reduces the work of the registrar. From a unit “customer service” standpoint, the registrar is the last place I’d look to save money. Now camping director, director of funding, etc, sure. Rangers, DEs, and registrars make my unit go round. The rest, I hope they are proving their value. I can’t tell as directly. -
Just thinking ... Just like current DOGE, I'm not sure it's really true savings. A good CE would raise at least his salary in donations to the council. Will reducing CEs reduce total donations? Do people donate because the top dog (the CE) asks for the donation ? -
-
The simple reason: a reputable caving association has not put forward a coherent set of requirements and waited for the roughly five year process of comment, testing and revision. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
Do not know about staff size, but guarantee that fundraising is a factor.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)