Open Discussion - Program
Share Scouting Topics here.
Subforums
-
- 815
- posts
-
- 2.8k
- posts
9677 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 35 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 789 views
-
- 20 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 927 views
-
- 2 replies
- 665 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 874 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.3k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
Harbor Freight has a couple options. Both are under $9. With a 90 day warranty, buy just before the project and any that end up breaking will be replaced. Both have good reviews as well. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
Agreed... that's why I said a bit more background or perspective in the article would go a long way to negating that perception. -
I am in no way wanting to restrict landowners using good management practices, but it looks like one thing, do something else if there is money to be made, scouting = $$ -
By RememberSchiff · Posted
The Hill Country Amateur Radio Club (HCARC) invited members of Troop 111 to take part in building a radio beacon. “One of our members is an executive in scouting, so when we do something that’s STEM oriented, we invite them. If they can find two or three scouts who are interested, then we support them and we present projects to them at their meetings,” said Hank Ortega, a local HAM operator and member of the HCARC. More at source, very interesting: https://www.hccommunityjournal.com/article_ddbf679f-1255-4f6e-92c9-34ad8e79ff48.html -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
@jcousinoand @mrjohns2, it would have been nice to have a Wildlife Manager's perspective in the article to provide some balance and background on this. (We would hope that the area is under good wildlife management, as it is a National Elk Refuge.) You are both correct, that, under the principles of Leave No Trace, we should "Leave What You Find". However, for all principles, there should be an overriding understanding that the owners and/or managers of the land have the prerogative to allow activities which might seem to be in conflict with the principles. Hunting in the National Elk Refuge is an example. The land managers know the herd is too large for the land to sustain, so they permit the hunting of elk to cull the herd to reduce the numbers to restore a balance. As I understand it, the elk antler hunt is a strictly managed, limited time, restricted entry event, so as to keep some of the antler resource in place. https://www.jacksonwy.gov/668/Antler-Shed-Hunt it is also quite funny to see the other side of this... now, some businesses are upset that the land managers and game commission are limiting the number of elk hunting licenses because the herd is getting smaller. https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news/environmental/local/jackson-elk-herd-hunt-season-sees-deeper-cuts-following-public-comment/article_5e6a7d56-4155-4832-8403-0b4af37f3594.html 'The outfitters blamed the herd’s downturn on wolves. “The pressure from predation up there is horrific,” Taylor said.' LOL... that's the mentality we really need to change... good luck 😜
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
- There are no registered users currently online