Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Eagle references


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#21 MattR

MattR

    Member

  • Members
  • 860 posts

Posted 21 April 2017 - 10:45 AM

I'm betting that's a district practice, not a council one.  I've seen quite a few backwards districts, but usually when it gets to a council level things are more per BSA GTA direction.  But then again, I'm in a very large council.  Some councils are the size of some of our districts.  

 

As for the practice, it's just wrong and a waster of time.  The SM has signed the eagle project and the eagle application.  If the SM won't sign those, there is a well written process to pursue rank under disputed circumstances.  Requiring a SM reference letter is just a weak, ill-defined, dead-end, non-BSA process.  Did I mention wrong?   :)

I don't know about calling it wrong. I can see redundant, not to mention extra work for the SM ;) And yet every time I sign off I think about a scouts pros and cons. I've already thought about the basics of a letter of recommendation. Those insights would always be positive (or else the SM would not have signed the app) so it could help the BOR get to know the scout.

 

But then again, our EBORs are fairly easy going, compared to the extremes I've heard about here.


  • 0

#22 The Blancmange

The Blancmange

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 660 posts

Posted 21 April 2017 - 11:25 AM

While I agree the letters should be destroyed per policy, what Scout is going to ask someone to give a reference if they even suspect that person will give an even slightly negative response?

 

I would tend to agree with that, but somewhere in the archives on this board is another discussion along these lines, and I recall people coming up with examples of negative references.   (I don't have time to search harder now.  Maybe a weekend task)


  • 0

#23 qwazse

qwazse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 6114 posts

Posted 21 April 2017 - 12:01 PM

I would tend to agree with that, but somewhere in the archives on this board is another discussion along these lines, and I recall people coming up with examples of negative references.   (I don't have time to search harder now.  Maybe a weekend task)

Maybe this one?

 

http://scouter.com/i...child/?p=407383

 

I pointed to one of my replies because, although I talk about putting negative things in writing, I've never felt that I've had to.


  • 0

#24 CherokeeScouter

CherokeeScouter

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 21 April 2017 - 12:34 PM

Really, how 1990's of you.  We are still in the 1960's as far as EBORs.   :)

LOL. Well, ours don''t work so well, which is why I'm reaching out. Maybe I need to go back to the future or at least the 1960s.


  • 0

#25 fred johnson

fred johnson

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 1357 posts

Posted 22 April 2017 - 10:45 AM

I don't know about calling it wrong. 

 

The original statement was that an EBOR would not be scheduled without a SM reference letter.  You can request and call directly a second time.  But if does not come in, it's wrong to not schedule the EBOR.  It's even wrong to delay an EBOR waiting for the reference letter.  That's BSA GTA documented..  


  • 0

#26 MattR

MattR

    Member

  • Members
  • 860 posts

Posted 22 April 2017 - 12:17 PM

The original statement was that an EBOR would not be scheduled without a SM reference letter.

Yeah, I see your point.

 

It would add to the BOR if the SM wanted to write it, but if it's required then it might not add anything positive, so pushing it is a mistake.


  • 0

#27 The Blancmange

The Blancmange

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 660 posts

Posted Yesterday, 11:22 AM

I would tend to agree with that, but somewhere in the archives on this board is another discussion along these lines, and I recall people coming up with examples of negative references.   (I don't have time to search harder now.  Maybe a weekend task)

 

Here is the thread I was thinking of, for what it's worth:

 

http://scouter.com/i...s-of-reference/


  • 0

#28 NJCubScouter

NJCubScouter

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 5601 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:28 PM

Here is the thread I was thinking of, for what it's worth:
 
http://scouter.com/i...s-of-reference/

 
Well, that's a strange old thread.  (And not just because it was from 2009 and the OP's profile says he was last active in the forum in 2007.  Sounds like either someone was doing some time-traveling, or it's just another bug in the system.)  The OP, who was apparently a brand new SM at the time, told of a Scout who was the subject of FOUR negative letters of reference at his EBOR, and he was not awarded the rank.  There was no explanation of why this may have been the case, nor was there any follow-up as to whether the Scout passed an EBOR at a later time or on appeal.  There were some other forum members who found this story difficult to believe, as they had never seen even one negative letter at an EBOR.  Then there was another poster who said something like "this happens sometimes" but without any specifics.

 

As I said earlier, I have never seen it happen either, but I am sure it does happen, and that old thread seems to support that idea.  It does not really shed any light on the kinds of situations in which it might happen.  One can only guess at the reasons why that Scout got four negative letters, and I mean that literally:  One can only guess.


  • 0

#29 fred johnson

fred johnson

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 1357 posts

Posted Yesterday, 02:02 PM

BSA Advancement Team published the May / June 2017 Advancement News.  It had a section on Reference Letters.  FYI.

 

http://files.constan...53aa8ec62a4.pdf


  • 0




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


IPB Skin By Virteq