Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Summer Camp Advancement

camp advancement first class

Best Answer Hedgehog , 29 July 2015 - 06:37 PM

So, I guess I wasn't very clear. what I'm wondering is this... You have the left hand box and then the right hand box on where the SM is expected to sign...

Would initials in the left hand side be acceptable...

An then have the SM review it.

 

 

 Similar to others, we don't have adults sign off on T through 1st requiements.  More senior scouts will sign off for the younger scouts.  In our troop, the SM or ASMs only sign off on service hours, scout spirit and SM conference.  

 

At summer camp, our scouts working toward 1st Class get a sheet showing what was reviewed.  The scouts take that to a Guide, APL, PL ASPL or SPL for sign off.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 TheGreyArea

TheGreyArea

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 03:31 PM

I am looking for an opinion on first class path advancement at summer camp.

Do you feel that it is acceptable for the Scoutmaster of a provisional unit to sign off on first class path advancement requirements, such as building a fire cooking over the fire, demonstrating first aid technique, etcetera etcetera?

How would you handle this?
  • 0

#2 Gone

Gone

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1811 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 03:47 PM

I am looking for an opinion on first class path advancement at summer camp.

Do you feel that it is acceptable for the Scoutmaster of a provisional unit to sign off on first class path advancement requirements, such as building a fire cooking over the fire, demonstrating first aid technique, etcetera etcetera?

How would you handle this?

 

If by provisional you mean that the troop was formed as a contingent of many scouts from several troops? No, I would not sign off. I would document what was done with the scout and send that to his home unit. Most summer camps do not sign books either. They will note what was covered and send that home with the scout. Some units check how well the scout learned the content and then sign off.


  • 0

#3 Stosh

Stosh

    BSA Heretic

  • Members
  • 12193 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 03:50 PM

I would not sign for any scout that is not registered with my troop, nor would I as SM direct anyone from my troop to do so.  As a MB counselor that is different, my sign off is expected when the work is finished.


  • 0

Stosh

 

There's a reason why I don't always answer the phone, doorbell or comments on forums.  :)


#4 qwazse

qwazse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 6612 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 03:52 PM

I have mixed feelings. Technically, I always want to see a PL's signature in nearly all but the last two reqs for Tenderfoot 2nd Class and 1st Class. But then, I want that to be a PL/SPL I recognize. So I can understand why an SM might take that responsibility for a provisional camper.

 

It sounds like you don't know this SM very well, and the boy garnered a lot of signatures.

I'd either

1. Give the guy a call.

2. Ask the scout to review the skills he mastered with his PL, and get the PL's opinion.


  • 0

#5 Eagle94-A1

Eagle94-A1

    Been there. Done that.

  • Members
  • 1903 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 05:05 PM

Depends upon who was the provisional SM. Also depends upon what the camp posted in their guide book.

 

I say that because I know some camps will put their 1st year camper staff as the provisional troop leaders. I was an exception, but that was because 25% of the provo troop were my scouts from the home troop. Some camps have the FYC staff sign off in the books, some have a handout, and some just state "This was worked on and your scout should be able to do." and leave the signing up to the troop.

 

While I'm a big proponent of youth signing off on the T-2-1, and after January 1, 2016 S-T-2-1, ranks. I do have some concerns about youth signing off.

 

1)  Youth leaders can only sign up to their own rank. So a Tenderfoot PL cannot sign off on Second Class requirements.

 

2) Non-youth leaders APPOINTED by the SPL to teach a skill, are acceptable to sign off.


  • 0

"Train 'em. Trust 'em. LET THEM LEAD!" William "Green Bar Bill" Hillcourt


#6 TheGreyArea

TheGreyArea

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 05:47 PM

So, I guess I wasn't very clear. what I'm wondering is this... You have the left hand box and then the right hand box on where the SM is expected to sign...

Would initials in the left hand side be acceptable...

An then have the SM review it.
  • 0

#7 Hedgehog

Hedgehog

    Erinaceomorpha Erinaceidae Member

  • Members
  • 684 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 06:37 PM   Best Answer

So, I guess I wasn't very clear. what I'm wondering is this... You have the left hand box and then the right hand box on where the SM is expected to sign...

Would initials in the left hand side be acceptable...

An then have the SM review it.

 

 

 Similar to others, we don't have adults sign off on T through 1st requiements.  More senior scouts will sign off for the younger scouts.  In our troop, the SM or ASMs only sign off on service hours, scout spirit and SM conference.  

 

At summer camp, our scouts working toward 1st Class get a sheet showing what was reviewed.  The scouts take that to a Guide, APL, PL ASPL or SPL for sign off.


  • 0

#8 qwazse

qwazse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 6612 posts

Posted 29 July 2015 - 08:57 PM

@TheGreyArea, as you can see, scouters try to be flexible when it comes to sign-offs, we try to assign it to boy leaders, and sometimes use adults as a fall back, but the buck stops at:

 

Does the boy have the skills?

 

People don't always appreciate that with this provisional camping stuff, it takes a good deal of communication. Now, the shortest loop is with the boy and his home PL. If he comes back tying knots, inviting his buddies over to cook a meal, lashing catapults, etc ... and mom complains that his pack is now sitting at the ready at the foot of the kid's bed ... the PL will be talking about it, and the boy's permanent SM can be confident in those signatures. If the home troop is not that cohesive, the SM may have to make a few phone calls. It is necessarily a learning experience for all parties involved.


  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: camp, advancement, first class

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


IPB Skin By Virteq